Comment author: pragmatist 13 April 2015 09:02:29AM *  1 point [-]

What exactly is that 70% supposed to quantify? Is the claim that, if I wake up tomorrow and no longer find my girlfriend physically attractive, I'll only be 30% as in love with her as I am now? Or is the claim that in 70% of heterosexual romantic relationships, if the male no longer finds the female attractive, he will no longer be in love with her?

Also, why do you consider this a "really good idea"?

Comment author: Liron 13 April 2015 02:26:23PM 2 points [-]

The former, except for the average male instead of you personally.

The type of this idea is "belief about the world", and it's good because it pays high rent in anticipated experience, like answering "yes" to your first question.

Comment author: DanielLC 13 April 2015 05:59:44AM 0 points [-]

Do you have a guess as to how much love in the reverse direction is physical attraction?

Comment author: Liron 13 April 2015 06:49:44AM 0 points [-]

15%

Comment author: falenas108 13 April 2015 12:08:58AM 1 point [-]

Is this idea for current Western society, or for love overall?

Comment author: Liron 13 April 2015 01:36:59AM 1 point [-]

Love overall.

Comment author: CurtisSerVaas 12 April 2015 11:53:16PM 0 points [-]

Also I should add this obviously isn't true for any males.

I think you meant to type many.

Comment author: Liron 13 April 2015 01:36:23AM 0 points [-]

Thx, edited.

Comment author: dxu 12 April 2015 10:25:15PM *  2 points [-]

Male to female

Are you specifying that direction of love, or are you simply referring to heterosexual love in general? If the former, why not the other way around (female-to-male)? If the latter, why not include other orientations?

Comment author: Liron 12 April 2015 11:25:03PM *  3 points [-]

The former; I was being precise. I don't think the reverse direction is true. My beliefs in both directions come from a combination of my understanding of evolutionary psychology plus anecdotal observations of myself and others. I can elaborate but I'll also ask why others don't believe this.

Also I should add this obviously isn't true for all males. I'm just trying to model the average case.

Comment author: Liron 12 April 2015 10:09:51PM *  0 points [-]

I have no idea what Thiel is thinking of, but I'll volunteer to get a brainstorm started:

Male to female love is 70% physical attraction. Yes, love.

Edit: I guess this related to race and gender, but I don't want to hold back one of my edgiest beliefs.

Comment author: TobyBartels 06 March 2015 06:30:33AM 4 points [-]

Nitpick: That's not the Chamber of Secrets.

Comment author: Liron 07 March 2015 05:10:01AM *  0 points [-]

Oh yeah, forgot the first book of canon ends in this Chamber of Secrets Jr.

Comment author: Liron 06 March 2015 12:18:14AM *  1 point [-]

Hey what ever happened with Snape's complicated potion in the Chamber of Secrets? Was that just a red herring?

Edit: I mean the other chamber.

Comment author: Capla 21 February 2015 05:26:43AM 0 points [-]

Why is this on Vimeo instead of Youtube? I can adjust the play-speed on YT videos.

Comment author: Liron 22 February 2015 12:19:00AM 3 points [-]
Comment author: caffemacchiavelli 11 February 2015 03:18:55PM *  1 point [-]

I enjoyed it, thanks for sharing. (Btw, are there more general, practical utility lectures like this?)

When you talk about being underwhelmed with other students, could you go into detail what criteria you'd specifically assess when making that judgment?

I've noticed that most intellectual doujins tend to think of themselves as particularly special and of other people as not quite as much, even if the empirical evidence isn't all that convincing (Mensa can be notoriously bad about this, so is the "I have goals!" self-help crowd), so I always take some time to look at the actual data before adopting a similar belief.

Comment author: Liron 11 February 2015 10:21:19PM 2 points [-]

Re general lectures, I also have a couple more of my own at liron.me/talks.

View more: Prev | Next