= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Typing "RationalWiki" into the search box in the upper right corner will return plenty of discussions about it.
In response to
RationalWiki's take on LW
Thank you, I did find some discussion and while I get the feeling that RationalWiki is seen as "wrong", I failed to find any proper backing of this opinion.
And the other question that is left unanswered is why Roko's basilisk is allowed to remain in that article, considering that it was purged off LW? (RW article comes up among top google searches on "lesswrong" so it might matter?)
RationalWiki's take on LW
I am not sure whether this has been posted here before but I came across this: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/LessWrong
What do you think about RationalWiki in general, and their opinion regarding LW?
I am still a high school student
I find your jumping to conclusions somewhat offensive. In fact, I don't feel socially disadvantaged for my interests.
In response to
Logical fallacies poster, a LessWrong adaptation.
If such poster is created, it should be distributed to as many high schools as possible.
In response to
Neil deGrasse Tyson on Cryonics
"I'd have more confidence if we had previously managed to pull this off with other mammals."
Some mammals are pretty good at doing it themselves... http://users.iab.uaf.edu/~brian_barnes/publications/1989barnes.pdf
In response to
Welcome to Less Wrong! (2012)
Hi everyone! I am still a high school student but very interested in what I read here on LessWrong! I decided to register to contribute to discussions. Until now, I have been lurking but hopefully I will be able to join the conversation in a useful way.
= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d){kind=logo}
Because Eliezer doesn't have the power to force RW to delete it.
Well, this is surely one thing that will not make it to http://lesswrong.com/lw/4g/eliezer_yudkowsky_facts/ :D