Comment author: Macaulay 08 October 2015 07:10:23AM 0 points [-]

If you're loss averse, the expected value could easily be negative: cost(voting for wrong candidate) > benefit((voting for right candidate).

Comment author: Macaulay 25 June 2015 05:36:32AM 2 points [-]

I was astonished to find myself having ascended to the pantheon of those who have made major contributions to human knowledge

Is this your own evaluation of your work?

Comment author: Macaulay 15 March 2015 07:02:21PM 0 points [-]

If the "tear apart the stars" prophecy just refers to Harry harvesting the stars for resources, then Voldemort looks really stupid for misinterpreting it.

Comment author: Macaulay 14 March 2015 11:05:28PM 5 points [-]

Now Hermione learns Patronus 2.0 and destroys Azkaban. So both the Boy-Who-Lived and the Girl-Who-Revived can kill dementors. Sounds like "surviving/defeating Voldemort" is a plausible cover for explaining the origin of the ability to destroy dementors.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 12 March 2015 09:57:20PM *  11 points [-]

I didn't want to tell it to you before because I thought it might prejudice your decision unfairly. If you were a good person who never killed or lied, but you had to do one or the other, which would be worse?

Notice how Harry doesn't want to "prejudice" Draco with a favorable truth?

I understand the impulse to shade the facts against yourself when being judged by others, but it isn't really fair to you or the person judging you.

I don't... don't want this anymore, I don't want to be manipulating you. I've hurt you too much already.

Because Harry's conscience pains him, he'll ask the 12 year old Draco to make a hugely life altering decision when he's in shock and hopeless about the future, and give him half an hour to do so, then hide that decision from him so that he can neither recant nor even know that he ever had such a choice, or made such a decision.

Time enough for such a decision after Draco had been reunited with his mother for a while. That talk, and that decision, could have waited til the start of the next school year, and Draco could have been given more time to make the decision.

Comment author: Macaulay 13 March 2015 03:08:34AM 3 points [-]

Isn't Harry saying this to Draco after Draco has been obliviated? Draco has no idea what Harry's talking about.

Comment author: Macaulay 04 March 2015 08:43:09PM 13 points [-]

Shouldn't Harry have fallen to his knees twenty seconds earlier, if he originally heard/saw the explosion via Voldie-simulcast?

Comment author: Macaulay 04 March 2015 08:36:06PM *  24 points [-]

"Harry, let me verify that your Time-Turner hasn't been used," said Professor McGonagall.

"LOOK OVER THERE!" Harry screamed, already sprinting for the door.

Comment author: Macaulay 04 March 2015 03:45:49AM 12 points [-]

Why are Hermione's robes red? Does Voldie want her to be Gryffindor?

Comment author: noahpocalypse 28 February 2015 09:34:50PM 1 point [-]

If what he said back in front of the Dementor is true, Voldie can't cast the Patronus regardless.

Comment author: Macaulay 28 February 2015 09:48:45PM 2 points [-]

What about Harry changing Voldie's understanding of death?

Comment author: Macaulay 28 February 2015 09:37:23PM 10 points [-]

Important: QQ's earlier parseltongue-spoken plans for Harry to become ruler of the world were said before he heard the 'tear apart the stars' prophecy. So it appears V changed his mind after hearing the prophecy.

View more: Next