In response to Why do people ____?
Comment author: Mark_Eichenlaub 04 May 2012 02:17:09PM 20 points [-]

Why do I fantasize about being angry?

I'm breaking the rule a bit by asking about myself here.

Sometimes when I have down time and am daydreaming, especially if I'm walking somewhere or going for a run, I fantasize about someone wronging me (say with a traffic violation), then imagine myself getting angry, yelling at them, and physically beating them up. I think about knocking them down, screaming at them, challenging them to get up, and knocking them down again.

I've never acted on such a fantasy. I have no idea how to actually fight someone if I wanted to. It's very rare that I show anger, and I don't think I've ever punched someone as an adult. But I think about it pretty regularly, and the thoughts disturb me. I have no idea where they come from or why I take pleasure in these sorts of fantasies.

Is this a common thought pattern? Why do people have it?

Comment author: Mark_Eichenlaub 02 May 2012 05:34:28AM *  27 points [-]

Asked today if the Titanic II could sink, Mr Palmer told reporters: "Of course it will sink if you put a hole in it."

http://www.smh.com.au/business/clive-palmer-plans-to-build-titanic-ii-20120430-1xtrc.html

Comment author: Mark_Eichenlaub 02 May 2012 05:33:38AM 16 points [-]

If you're trying to choose between two theories and one gives you an excuse for being lazy, the other one is probably right.

Paul Graham “What You’ll Wish You’d Known” http://paulgraham.com/hs.html

Comment author: Mark_Eichenlaub 02 May 2012 05:29:43AM *  18 points [-]

I don't think we can get much more specific without starting to be mistaken.

Paul Graham, "Is It Worth Being Wise?" http://paulgraham.com/wisdom.html

Comment author: Mark_Eichenlaub 25 April 2012 07:19:46AM 13 points [-]

I like the idea. Perhaps we should start a periodic discussion thread where people post midrange goals and get feedback.

Comment author: faul_sname 24 April 2012 04:39:02AM 6 points [-]

I think you accidentally a word in your title (should read "If calorie restriction works in humans, shouldn't we have observed it already?").

That said, you bring up a good point, and I would also like to see this question answered.

Comment author: Mark_Eichenlaub 24 April 2012 04:58:52AM 1 point [-]

thanks for the catch

If calorie restriction works in humans, should we have observed it already?

21 Mark_Eichenlaub 24 April 2012 04:28AM

Although there are no long-term scientific studies of calorie restriction in humans, there are religious groups, cults, and ascetics who voluntarily practice calorie restriction or intermittent fasting. Presumably there have been tens or hundreds of thousands of people who have practiced calorie restriction throughout most of their adult lives. There were/are probably also groups that involuntarily practice calorie restriction - servants, slaves, prisoners, or people who simply regularly don't have enough to eat.

 

If calorie restriction has a dramatic effect on life expectancy in humans, shouldn't we expect to observe extended life expectancy in at least some groups? Or would each of these groups likely have some mitigating circumstances that would shorten their lifespans, such as lack of medicine?

 

With an hour on Google, I found some references to Okinawa, to monks on Mount Athos, and to similar groups. In no case was there a reasonable claim of life expectancy over 90 (which would represent just a 10% improvement over life expectancy in Japan).

 

This paper reviews the evidence on calorie restriction in humans and other animals, including discussion of religious fasting, but there's no evidence there of fasting extending lifespan.

I found a few other sources where people asked this question (or made this point as an attack on CR), but I haven't yet found any good answers on the subject, and didn't find any discussion on LessWrong yet.

Comment author: Locke 22 April 2012 04:10:18AM 0 points [-]

What about vitamins/medication? Isn't Ray Kurzweil on like fifty different pills? Why isn't everyone?

Comment author: Mark_Eichenlaub 22 April 2012 07:53:04PM 4 points [-]
Comment author: [deleted] 22 April 2012 10:40:25AM *  -2 points [-]

“Everyone” is tricky, since the main causes of mortality vary with your age. Anyway, I'd say, not smoking, exercising, not being obese (nor emaciated, but in the parts of the world where most Internet users are, short of anorexia nervosa this isn't likely to be a problem), driving less and in a less aggressive way, not committing suicide... Don't they teach this stuff in high school?

In response to comment by [deleted] on Stupid Questions Open Thread Round 2
Comment author: Mark_Eichenlaub 22 April 2012 07:50:49PM 16 points [-]

The last sentence is patronizing, and especially inappropriate in a thread about asking stupid questions.

Comment author: Mark_Eichenlaub 21 April 2012 10:42:44PM 2 points [-]

What's 3^^^3?

Is this Knuth's arrow notation?

Comment author: Mark_Eichenlaub 21 April 2012 10:44:59PM 12 points [-]

wait, that was easier to search than I thought. http://lesswrong.com/lw/kn/torture_vs_dust_specks/

Yes, it is Knuth's arrow notation.

View more: Prev | Next