Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

Comment author: Matt5 17 February 2009 07:39:36AM 0 points [-]

I am considered a cynical person, but I also understand that some ignoble intentions might be transparent if I am too cynical. So even having that in mind, I still feel the need to be cynical. I feel the need to burst peoples' bubbles when they are overly optimistic about an idea, or that it looks like they didn't put much thought in what they believe. I don't know why I have such an urge to force people to be more rigorous with their belief-forming processes. Maybe it is just a pet peeve of mine.

Comment author: Matt5 25 January 2009 09:21:25PM 0 points [-]

Apparently having 72 virgins at your disposal is a utopia for many. EY should look into this...

In response to Lawful Uncertainty
Comment author: Matt5 11 November 2008 04:57:33AM 0 points [-]

A Pickup Artist,

(kind of off topic)

I am also a PUA and have thought about this debate for a while. I think that successful routines can expire after some point. If a girl has heard your routine before, she is likely to turn you down. The best routines are ones that abide by the LOAs and where the target doesn't know the routine. This unpredictable factor in your routine demonstrates romance, intelligence, spontaneity and other alpha male qualities.

Buying a potential female a drink at the bar is a perfect example of an expired method. The Buy You a Drink routine theoretically makes sense (shows economic status), as it abides by the LOAs. The problem is that this method is too widely used and exposes the PA or AFC as predictable, unoriginal, unromantic, and bad intentioned. This failure should emphasis the importance of using personalized and original methods.

Comment author: Matt5 01 November 2008 07:43:20PM 0 points [-]

Why are these blogging head interviews Eliezer has always end up more funny than informative?