Comment author: adsenanim 08 September 2010 06:09:40PM 0 points [-]

The calculus example is a good one for examining goal-achievement.

I am currently taking Calculus 2, Integration by Trigonometric Substitution is one of the methods.

The textbook I am using is very Implicit in examples explaining this method, and I have thought many times about how much easier it would be if it were to use more Explicit examples.

Implicit examples by nature take more time and effort than explicit examples, making the implicit less likely to be chosen than the explicit.

It would have to be one very highly motivated 8-year-old to pass the calculus test, or one that has an extremely high ability to understand implicit examples.

As far as the goals of a comedian, he/she would have to be very highly motivated and very good at implicit learning to gain anything from 'Garfield and Friends'.

Myself, I would choose George Carlin as an explicit example…

Comment author: Matt_Duing 09 September 2010 05:57:25AM 1 point [-]

The examples on www.patrickjmt.com might help.

In response to comment by [deleted] on Humans are not automatically strategic
Comment author: AnnaSalamon 08 September 2010 07:20:56PM *  13 points [-]

I agree plane crash concerns are generally more irrational. But I mean... take me, for example. I know plane crashes and sharks are mostly negligible while car accidents and humans present larger risks; that much information reached me be accident. But, even though I regularly go out of my way to "reduce my risk from car accidents", I haven't ever bothered to look up info on e.g. which lane is safest to drive in, or how accident rates scale with sleep deprivation, or which freeways near my home present the largest risk. I'm motivated to do activities I associate with driving safety, but not to systematically estimate and reduce the risks. If a book was published on how to actually reduce my risk, I might read it, but more because it fits my identity as an aspiring rationalist and an aspiring goal-oriented person than than to, you know, actually reduce my risk of death. Which is the point.

Comment author: Matt_Duing 09 September 2010 05:48:06AM 4 points [-]

wrt sleep deprivation, according to a DOT driver's manual, driving without having slept in 18 hours is equivalent in risk to driving with a .08 blood alcohol level. Driving without having slept in 24 hours corresponds to a .10 blood alcohol level.

Comment author: Matt_Duing 13 August 2010 06:13:06AM 1 point [-]

"They never do tests. Not many real deeds either. Oh, conversation with your grandmother's shade in a darkened room, the odd love potion or two, but comes a doubter, why, then it's the wrong day, the planets are not in line, the entrails are not favorable, we don't do tests!" -Tyrian, Dragonslayer

Comment author: Matt_Duing 02 June 2010 04:03:17AM *  15 points [-]

"It's wonderful how much we suck compared to us ten years from now!"

-- Michael Blume

Comment author: Matt_Duing 16 June 2010 03:35:49AM 2 points [-]

A troubling possible implication of this is if the impact we can expect to have on existential risks diminishes over time, then as the competence of our plans and actions increases, the expected importance of those choices tends to decrease.

Comment author: Matt_Duing 14 June 2010 01:31:16AM 2 points [-]

I have the same problem also and it sounds like this will help. Thank you.

Comment author: Morendil 09 June 2010 05:02:00PM *  6 points [-]

Please reply to this comment if you intend to participate, and are willing and able to free up a few hours per week or fortnight to work through the suggested reading or exercises.

Please indicate where you live, if you would be willing to have some discussion IRL. My intent is to facilitate an online discussion here on LW but face-to-face would be a nice complement, in locations where enough participants live.

(You need not check in again here if you have already done so in the previous discussion thread, but you can do so if you want to add details such as your location.)

Comment author: Matt_Duing 11 June 2010 04:11:22AM 0 points [-]

I live in Pittsburgh and would like to participate.

Comment author: khafra 03 June 2010 04:56:26AM 4 points [-]

After more-or-less successfully avoiding it for most of LW's history, we've plunged headlong into mind-killer territory. I'm a little bit worried, and I'm intrigued to find out what long-time LWers, especially those who've been hesitant about venturing that direction, expect to see as a result over the next month or two.

Comment author: Matt_Duing 03 June 2010 05:17:06AM 1 point [-]

My feelings on this are mixed. I've found LW to be a refreshing refuge from such quarrels. On the other hand, without careful thought political debates reliably descend into madness quickly, and it is not as if politics is unimportant. Perhaps taking the mental techniques discussed here to other forums could improve the generally atrocious level of reasoning usually found in online political discussions, though I expect the effect would be small.

Comment author: Matt_Duing 02 June 2010 04:15:13AM 11 points [-]

"Sanity is conforming your thoughts to reality. Conforming reality to your thoughts is creativity."

-- Unknown

Comment author: Matt_Duing 02 June 2010 04:03:17AM *  15 points [-]

"It's wonderful how much we suck compared to us ten years from now!"

-- Michael Blume

Comment author: CronoDAS 21 May 2010 09:10:26PM 13 points [-]

You can add me to the list of people who sent an email.

Comment author: Matt_Duing 27 May 2010 07:45:17AM 3 points [-]

I'm delighted to hear this.

View more: Prev | Next