Comment author: Multiheaded 25 November 2012 03:21:53PM *  0 points [-]

philanthropy status divas, professional beggars and related hangers-on

those who believe in thinking, but only for fashionable thoughts

Okay, so would you kindly point to some awful, worthless posts/comments by those awful, worthless people? And explain what makes them so awful and worthless? So that the right-thinking users can learn to avoid them?

Or, if you don't have anything specific in mind, would you at least cease insulting the community?

Comment author: NMJablonski 26 November 2012 06:15:13PM -1 points [-]

No

Comment author: [deleted] 14 November 2012 04:02:01PM *  7 points [-]

I think about this stuff quit a lot and generally seek out strong counterarguments. I dislike people down voting a comment I'm certain stands up to the level of discourse here while not exposing their own reasoning on the matter.

If you think I don't have a good idea about the level of discourse here, well then people should have been down voting me much more aggressively over the past few years I've spent in this community, people seem to have generally liked my contributions.

My comment complaining over this might was in hindsight perhaps inappropriate and I've retracted it, however the reason I'm not as phased as I once was by down votes is because I think the quality of the LessWrong community is slowly degrading and only aggressive counter measures can stop it.

Comment author: NMJablonski 15 November 2012 11:28:43PM 0 points [-]

SIAI needed to improve as an organization, so they brought in people who they thought could run a successful non-profit. What they got was a better non-profit plus the whole accompanying spectrum of philanthropy status divas, professional beggars and related hangers-on.

Most of the original thinkers have left, replaced by those who believe in thinking, but only for fashionable thoughts.

Comment author: Multiheaded 12 November 2012 07:51:02PM 2 points [-]

Not UR comments, go easy on the jargon

Comment author: NMJablonski 12 November 2012 11:28:14PM 3 points [-]

Jargon separates the raw value systems I'm talking about from the tribes that cling to them. I figured this would be less mind-killing but still communicative to the sort of person who cares about this thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 07 November 2012 10:27:31PM *  5 points [-]

Reactionary Rationalist Plotting, Advice Requested

I'm an atheist that lives in Slovenia a mostly secular place with a cosy social democracy yet I'm also a young no income white male and seeing some deeply disturbing kinds of language among the cool set referring to my demographic. Seems pretty stage three-ish by Stanton's scale. I'm quit sure my country will import them in a matter of a few years because we've had rapid cultural convergence with US norms after the fall of Communism. I'm also quite certain at this point that there is a real risk about 0.05 to 0.1 for some rather nasty outcomes in just a few decades.

Not to imply this is me resenting cultural imperialism or something, we would have inevitably gotten there too on our own, I blame silly forager morality and signaling games attached to it that have been unleashed by material prosperity. To make a short argument for my concerns market dominant minorities and democracies are not happy combinations. Minorities that do well economically end up targets of irrational hate. The memetic core for scapegoating for various problems that will only grow worse is clearly there and unlikely to be opposed strongly by any institution I'm aware of.

Being from the former Yugoslavia I have very little confidence Western Europe is going to be a pleasant place in a few decades since its economies probably won't ever really recover. The fundamentals are rotten, the political system incapable of reform. That and competing tribes coexisting tightly when the economy is bad is a major sign of bad news for me. Technological progress may keep them afloat with 1 to 2 or even 3 percent GDP growth but they won't ever be centers of innovation and will be ever more outshines by other parts of the world. The welfare states there are also unsustainable because of aging.

I'm thinking to teach my children & grandchildren to not be too attached to any particular country and be ready to move at the drop of a hat. Maybe even try to set up a viable subculture around that. I'm thinking Cyber Gypsies or some economic/cultural niche like that. The settled alternative is probably the machete.

Maybe move to the US while there is still some money to be made and then perhaps go to Singapore before it becomes a democracy. Maybe stay there at that point but I have a feeling it will go downhill pretty rapidly. Maybe South Korea? It will be a downgrade from Singapore certainly but its been opening up its borders so immigration there should be easier by them. Also it is going to take several decades for it to be fucked up to European levels by forager morality so that seems an ok place to go.

In response to comment by [deleted] on Open Thread, November 1-15, 2012
Comment author: NMJablonski 07 November 2012 10:59:41PM -2 points [-]

It's not much better in the US. I live in a fairly Townie area, but there is a University, which has a student body unanimous in its adoration of Brahmin values. All of my young coworkers chattered with glee this morning at the "humiliation" of the "enemy".

In response to comment by [deleted] on Open Thread, November 1-15, 2012
Comment author: fubarobfusco 07 November 2012 10:45:08PM *  1 point [-]

I'm an atheist that lives in Slovenia a mostly secular place with a cosy social democracy yet I'm also a young no income white male and seeing some deeply disturbing kinds of language among the cool set with regards referring to my demographic.

Sorry, could you be more explicit here? It sounds like you may be talking around a topic that you think is obvious, but that may be illusion of transparency.

Comment author: NMJablonski 07 November 2012 10:53:35PM *  8 points [-]

Konkvistador is a concerned Tutsi living in a politico-cultural regime which seems increasingly pleased at the prospect of watching Hutus eat Tutsis.

Comment author: [deleted] 24 October 2012 04:03:55PM *  6 points [-]

But wait recommending people have children later de facto significantly reduces their total fertility too.

Are we really that hypersensitive to eugenics? I think eugenics is a great idea, yet this feels a strange policy to promote despite this. I think there is something more primal going on with the weak link to eugenics being just a rationalization for it.

In response to comment by [deleted] on Equality and natalism
Comment author: NMJablonski 24 October 2012 04:17:28PM *  2 points [-]

Isn't it as simple as the fact that eugenicist ideas, even obviously good ones, assume the reality of HBD and therefore violate Western Universalist taboos?

Comment author: Furslid 07 September 2012 09:45:38PM 5 points [-]

I think the most important advice is not "Don't be a creep." It is "Do not tolerate creepiness in others."

If someone is accused of being a creep do not back them up or dismiss their accuser unless you are damn sure they weren't being creepy. If someone looks creepy based on social cues (ex. is focusing on someone much more intently than it is returned.) consider creating a break in the conversation that would allow for a graceful exit. If someone is consistently creepy, especially with touching or gross innuendo and will not stop they should not be welcome in your group.

Comment author: NMJablonski 07 September 2012 10:26:57PM 17 points [-]

Assume guilt!

In response to A free Utopia
Comment author: NMJablonski 21 June 2012 09:05:52PM 2 points [-]

It is a genuine challenge for me to tell if this is a joke.

Is this post meant as satire?

Comment author: [deleted] 14 June 2012 03:54:56PM 4 points [-]

Conventional produce and organic produce are nutritionally equivalent

Interesting! Can you link to the literature you've read?

In response to comment by [deleted] on Organic food, conventional food
Comment author: NMJablonski 14 June 2012 03:59:00PM 6 points [-]
Comment author: NMJablonski 14 June 2012 03:47:41PM *  12 points [-]

All the reliable literature I have read says that:

a) Conventional produce and organic produce are nutritionally equivalent

b) Organic produce is more prone to rancidity as fewer preservatives are used

c) Organic produce will make you popular with people who wear glasses with no lenses

View more: Next