Comment author: Elo 26 July 2016 01:11:52PM -2 points [-]

The conversation is more than 6 months old. How did you draw that conclusion? Did you have a set of possible problems? Did you narrow them down? Did you consider anything along the way? How did you rule them out?

Comment author: Romashka 26 July 2016 05:00:05PM 4 points [-]

The conversation being six months in the past is irrelevant - this is the only piece of evidence we have, so there's no reason to change the conclusion.

You're asking people who, in their majority, aren't neurophysiologists, and so cannot possibly do these things. We do not even know what set of recognized mental conditions this person has.

OTOH, I would probably say that priority #1 would be to find someone - possibly the girlfriend - to keep track of Zebra's condition, since spacing out sounds very dangerous.

Comment author: Romashka 26 July 2016 07:02:22AM 3 points [-]

LW spoilt me. I now watch The Mickey Mouse Club as a story of an all-powerful, all-knowing AI and knowledge sent back from the future...

Comment author: Alicorn 17 September 2010 03:08:06AM 2 points [-]

I find that I do not want to eat until at least an hour after waking up in the morning, and if I do anyway, it doesn't settle properly in my stomach or something and I feel sort of nauseated until midafternoon.

Comment author: Romashka 25 July 2016 04:36:05PM 0 points [-]

Ever since I bore a child, I've been more-or-less unable to stomach food until 9 am. Even weak tea. (Might be psychological, for all I know.) Yet recently, I tried tea with two pieces of lozenge-like candy, and it worked.

Comment author: Romashka 21 July 2016 06:27:56PM 2 points [-]

How likely is it that polls on happiness, subjective well-being, self-worth, subjective productivity etc. are influenced by the position of the date of the poll relative to school year? (School has dictated my plans for sixteen years, and with my kid enrolled in the kindergarten we enter the same pattern. That's half my life, optimistically speaking.)

I suppose in people whose work is built upon different seasonalities (like seashore resort employees, or long-distance delivery workers, probably?), ratings should differ from the rest of the population.

In response to Less Wrong Parents
Comment author: Romashka 20 July 2016 08:39:44AM 0 points [-]

One thing I personally found useful is to train yourself to check upon the kid more often then I would say were necessary if asked. Starting with sudden peaks in temperature and ending, so far, with ruined wallpaper. Just do it:)

Comment author: Algernoq 19 July 2016 04:53:01AM 0 points [-]

acted to prevent, what he thought to be, the global catastrophic risk?

That makes it all OK, right?

Hooray! I can be sociopathically self-centered as long as I describe it in a politically-correct way!

Comment author: Romashka 19 July 2016 05:37:49AM 0 points [-]

No, that makes it inconsistent.

Comment author: SquirrelInHell 18 July 2016 12:31:39PM 0 points [-]

All this sounds interesting, but without more resources (or biology background) I'm not sure I'm getting this.

I like the difference between single points and frontlines of influence.

Is the frontline (as you mean it) only considered in time (not e.g. physical space)? I.e. it's just a different way of saying "something exerts influence for a period of time" vs "something changes suddenly"?

And, also from veg.sc., the notion of (scaled) phytosociological relevés.

I think I get what the process looks like, but does it mean as a concept? E.g. what else would you use it to describe?

And lastly, the Image of the Species, which is the image of something you have encountered many times and recognize "directly", which might differ from such shaped by a different set of observations.

Do you mean the observation that human brains represent categories by remembering "typical examples" of items in that category?

Comment author: Romashka 18 July 2016 02:06:37PM 1 point [-]

only considered in time

No, it is usually used for space. Something like internal design of workplaces, or being distracted by a coughing fit at an opera, or placing the cherry on top of the cake, or skirting puddles, all of that:) But you can say, for exaple, that learning about human hormone system by reading about separate hormones gives you points of "illumination", and then imagining the profile of, for example, pregnancy, is more of a line. (Maybe?.. I seldom have to articulate that. For me, the "line" is more like the front of a cloudbank, where you know there is a whole bag of "weather" contained, but don't yet know what that weather would be.)

relevés

I guess I meant a certain skill, which allows to output a strictly formalized answer, has to be useful across a really wide set of circumstances, and when internalized feels like a rush of data and corrections.

typical examples

No, it is rather a blended memory of all such organisms one sees. Like, "well, it is rather too oblong for yeast, but I still think it is yeast", you know? Typical examples are things people admire, and they should be the basis for the Images of the Species, but in practice I think it never happens and this is likely for the best.

Please find better names for these things, if you think they are useful. I simply remembered what I found applicable outside of botany, but, well:)

Comment author: Romashka 18 July 2016 11:20:35AM *  0 points [-]

I like the difference between single points and frontlines of influence. It comes up in vegetation science, where there is the Eternal Question of the Continuity of Communities; and some events and environments in my life felt like approaching lines, like the marriage, and some like points, like the wedding.

And, also from veg.sc., the notion of (scaled) phytosociological relevés. When you do that, you have to "edit" the picture of "grass and shrubbery" you see so that you can estimate the % of soil covered by different species, and not be distracted by flowers & dead plants, and probably recognize levels within the "grass", etc., and look for patchiness, etc., and find a way to express it all. I have known people compiling relevés in ten minutes flat; a colleague wave a hand at a spot of Erythronium caucasicum, half-screened by the rain, and remark "Huh, no clones here"... It just becomes a way of seeing stuff, with practice. Wiki

And lastly, the Image of the Species, which is the image of something you have encountered many times and recognize "directly", which might differ from such shaped by a different set of observations.

Comment author: Viliam 17 July 2016 09:20:45PM *  0 points [-]

At the moments when you are happy with your life, the desire to escape from reality reduces dramatically. So I guess a high-level approach might be to optimize your life to be more happy, even if it seems like it would reduce your productivity, because you may get the side effect of procrastinating less.

This article was about the low-level approach, when your life already kinda sucks and you cannot fix it at the moment, only try to reduce the damage.

In your case, the obvious question seems to be: "Can you arrange things so you would tutor more, and do whatever is the other thing less? And perhaps hire some babysitter to help with the kid." Alternatively, could you somehow optimize your environment (or more precisely, your kid's environment) so that less of your attention is needed?

(My high-level approach is to change my frustrating job, and I am already doing some interviews. Also, some other frustrating things will go away in the future; unfortunately the changes take time that I can't speed up, so it's approximately two more months.)

Comment author: Romashka 18 July 2016 04:57:42AM 0 points [-]

Oh, it's alright, really, about the kid, and I get helped a lot. And the job used to feel like a godsend when I had just left a PhD program. It is just - I'm thinking of procrastinating darning or mending, or listening to podcasts - when I feel more secure about having needles with me or not immediately hearing any change, I'll try that.

Comment author: Algernoq 17 July 2016 08:16:03AM *  1 point [-]

No...Voldemort isn't altruistic, and considers the "global community" too disorganized to be an ally worth seeking favor with.

Comment author: Romashka 17 July 2016 05:56:29PM 2 points [-]

...you do realize he is Voldemort? The one who acted to prevent, what he thought to be, the global catastrophic risk?

View more: Prev | Next