In response to lessannoying.org
Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 29 May 2011 01:33:34AM 0 points [-]

I click on the link, and I can't scroll down past the bullet point about American Idol conversations.

Comment author: Schlega 29 May 2011 01:50:35AM 1 point [-]

It's just an image, not a real site. The link to the full article is in Bongo's comment.

Comment author: jsalvatier 26 May 2011 03:14:13PM *  6 points [-]

I saw this too, I think he means 'maximum entropy over the outcomes (ball draws)' rather than 'maximum entropy over the parameters in your model'. The intuition is that if you posit no structure to your observations, making an observation doesn't tell you anything about your future observations. Though, that interpretation doesn't quite fit since he specified he knew they were drawn with a known probability.

One of the things EY made me realize is that any modeling is part of the prior. Specifically a model is a prior about how observations are related. For example, part of your model might be 'balls are independently with a constant but unknown probability'. If you had a maximum entropy prior over the draws, you would say something more like 'ball draws are completely unrelated and determined by completely separate processes'.

Comment author: Schlega 28 May 2011 10:36:27PM 1 point [-]

This still confuses me. 'Ball draws are completely unrelated and determined by completely separate processes' still contains information about how the balls were generated. It seems like if you observed a string of 10 red balls, then your hypothesis would lose probability mass to the hypothesis 'ball draws are red with p > 0.99.'

It seems like the problem only happens if you include an unjustified assumption in your 'prior', then refuse to consider the possibility that you were wrong.

My prior information is that every time I have found something Eliezer said confusing, it has eventually turned out that I was mistaken. I expect this to remain true, but there's a slight possibility that I am wrong.

Comment author: Schlega 14 May 2011 10:32:39PM 0 points [-]

I've been intending to get more involved in this community for a while. I will come on Saturday, but I won't be able to make the Wednesday meetings. Just out of curiosity, is there anybody who would be interested in a regular Antelope Valley meetup?

Comment author: Schlega 14 May 2011 04:37:07AM 3 points [-]

My understanding is that your conversion was based primarily on the goodness and love of your Mormon friends. If other evidence were to convince you that the Mormon God does not exist, would you expect them to continue to treat you with goodness and love?

Comment author: Schlega 22 January 2011 09:25:00PM 8 points [-]

This scenario is much farther along the impossible scale than reviving an intact brain. If I wanted to live forever, I would make absolutely sure that I had a plan that did not involve violating the laws of physics.

(Not that I'm an expert physicist, but my understanding is that decomposition is an irreversible process.)

Comment author: Schlega 22 January 2011 08:43:51PM 0 points [-]

This is the first time I've ventured out of the MoR and Luminosity threads, and I support 5. If the limit was 1, spambots would eventually learn to post "Hey, I'm new" then wait a few hours before spamming.

Of course, this would also mean that no one should vote up a "Hey, I'm new" comment beyond 4.

Comment author: Schlega 15 December 2010 01:12:34PM 0 points [-]

These past few chapters have been excellent. Now I'm curious about how effective a weaponized version of Elspeth's power would be against Bella. Does it penetrate Bella's shield, or does Bella need to consciously allow it through?

Comment author: TobyBartels 06 December 2010 05:19:07AM *  1 point [-]

There's a potion too, right? (Whatever's in the cauldron before Wormtail's hand is added, although that might have only been in the movie.) If that has to be made before the grave is robbed and goes bad after a few hours, then you have a time limit.

Comment author: Schlega 14 December 2010 09:59:36AM 1 point [-]

I had forgotten about the potion.

Still, I don't think he would have bothered breaking Bellatrix out if he didn't expect to use her in the ritual. I also can't think of a reason to have her hide his wand next to his father's grave unless that connection was enough to keep the bone potent.

Comment author: PeterS 11 December 2010 12:01:56AM 4 points [-]

Good idea. But this effectively makes failing to "go quietly" punishable by death.

Comment author: Schlega 14 December 2010 09:38:54AM 3 points [-]

Replace execution with Somnium. That way, people who prefer death over imprisonment can be revived if they are later exonerated.

Comment author: Schlega 03 December 2010 05:49:31AM 9 points [-]

"And before you ask, it must be the original grave, the place of first burial, the bone removed during the ritual and not before. Thus he cannot have retrieved it earlier; and also there is no point in substituting the skeleton of a weaker ancestor. He would notice it had lost all potency."

I wonder how long a ritual can last. If it was started ten years ago but never finished, would that be a loophole?

View more: Prev | Next