If it's a draft, only you can see it. That's what a draft is, in the terms of the software that runs this site. For anyone else to see it, you must publish it, although judging by what you've written so far I don't have high hopes of the result.

You may agree or disagree, I respect that

That sounds like pre-emptively pressing the Ignore button on such disagreement. A disagreement is a problem. Some disagreements may be too trifling to be worth resolving, but disagreeing over whether there is a God is a rather large problem. It's not something to which you can just say, "well, I believe this and you believe that, and that's ok" without undermining the very activity of seeking the truth. Have you in fact anticipated such disagreement and want to avoid engaging with it?

If you read these two articles and this sequence, I promise to upvote your comments enough that you will be able to post in the discussion section.

Some warnings:

*The sequence is kind of long.

*If you post the draft you've already written to discussion, it will probably be downvoted enough that you'll have a hard time getting back the privilege to post articles.

*This, and the downvotes you've already received, are not because anyone is intimidated by your argument, or because they feel threatened by the possibility of your being right.

*The articles and sequence may be difficult for you to understand at this point.

However, if you do all this reading, and understand it, I think you will understand why you've been downvoted, and will be able to predict how your draft will be received.

Hypothetically, you could upvote the rest of Seremonia's comments here if you want to see the article.

As you said: "Which philosophical problems do you think are solved, and what is the answer?"

I have proof of the existence of God, but I need a minimum of karma = 2 in order to publish in the discussion. Is there someone help me to have the opportunity to publish? Thank you.

I already had karma = 2, Thank you I already submitted on http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/51d/there_is_god/

If it's a draft, only you can see it. That's what a draft is, in the terms of the software that runs this site. For anyone else to see it, you must publish it, although judging by what you've written so far I don't have high hopes of the result.

You may agree or disagree, I respect that

That sounds like pre-emptively pressing the Ignore button on such disagreement. A disagreement is a problem. Some disagreements may be too trifling to be worth resolving, but disagreeing over whether there is a God is a rather large problem. It's not something to which you can just say, "well, I believe this and you believe that, and that's ok" without undermining the very activity of seeking the truth. Have you in fact anticipated such disagreement and want to avoid engaging with it?

If it's a draft, only you can see it. That's what a draft is, in the terms of the software that runs this site. For anyone else to see it, you must publish it, although judging by what you've written so far I don't have high hopes of the result.

You may agree or disagree, I respect that

That sounds like pre-emptively pressing the Ignore button on such disagreement. A disagreement is a problem. Some disagreements may be too trifling to be worth resolving, but disagreeing over whether there is a God is a rather large problem. It's not something to which you can just say, "well, I believe this and you believe that, and that's ok" without undermining the very activity of seeking the truth. Have you in fact anticipated such disagreement and want to avoid engaging with it?

If it's a draft, only you can see it. That's what a draft is, in the terms of the software that runs this site. For anyone else to see it, you must publish it, although judging by what you've written so far I don't have high hopes of the result.

You may agree or disagree, I respect that

That sounds like pre-emptively pressing the Ignore button on such disagreement. A disagreement is a problem. Some disagreements may be too trifling to be worth resolving, but disagreeing over whether there is a God is a rather large problem. It's not something to which you can just say, "well, I believe this and you believe that, and that's ok" without undermining the very activity of seeking the truth. Have you in fact anticipated such disagreement and want to avoid engaging with it?