Comment author: Lumifer 25 February 2016 04:33:09PM 3 points [-]

"after a string of red, black is more likely" people

Happens to be true for sampling from a finite set without replacement :-P

Comment author: Simon79 25 February 2016 04:40:22PM 2 points [-]

You got me ;-) I should have specified "at the roulette".....I'm new here, still have to get used to you guys

Comment author: HungryHobo 23 February 2016 11:08:35AM *  6 points [-]

The very basics of probability. I'm talking to the level of "there is about a 1 in 6 chance of a reasonably fair dice coming up 3 on a single roll"

I remember a friend telling me about a game some of his classmates played which was basically about calling high/low on the next card dealt.

He'd made a modest and steady income simply calling based on whether it was greater or less than 7 for the first few cards and he was known as being "lucky". They honestly couldn't comprehend something as simple as that.

Comment author: Simon79 25 February 2016 03:54:13PM 2 points [-]

Absolutely. Not to mention all the "after a string of red, black is more likely" people....and there are a lot out there

Comment author: Xyrik 14 December 2015 09:25:00AM -1 points [-]

Would someone be able to enlighten me on what the cons of a hypothetical situation in which everyone on the planet decides to temporarily get rid of the concept of money or currency, and pool our collective resources and ideas without worrying about who owes who? I mean on paper it sounds great, and obviously this is extremely hypothetical as it's virtually impossible to get all human life on Earth to actually do that, but are there hidden cons here that I'm not really seeing?

I've not really gone into too much thought on this, it was mostly a fleeting thought, and I was curious what others thought.

Comment author: Simon79 14 December 2015 10:50:36AM 1 point [-]

Free riding