Comment author: KnaveOfAllTrades 23 August 2013 07:56:48AM 2 points [-]

Reply to this comment if you’re interested in being part of a rationalist house in London, UK.

Comment author: UngnsCobra 25 August 2013 06:12:34PM 2 points [-]

Yes

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 29 May 2013 05:12:07AM 2 points [-]

The UN has those numbers. I've only used the old version.

Comment author: UngnsCobra 30 May 2013 03:13:12PM 0 points [-]

Thank you I have come across FAO - proved to be very useful!

Comment author: UngnsCobra 27 May 2013 09:47:56PM 3 points [-]

I'm not confident this is the right outlet (and if so I apologize) but does anyone have tips on good data sources for ex; poultry statistics - trying to get hold of data for each individual country the amount of eggs produced on a year by year, country by country basis. appreciate any tips! Where do you go to find your data? (choose to make this an open question)

Comment author: buybuydandavis 31 March 2013 12:57:00PM *  2 points [-]

Is anyone systematically working on the other side of the pancake: existential opportunities?

People are working on particular opportunities, but I haven't heard of people doing the depth first search for opportunities.

Comment author: UngnsCobra 31 March 2013 03:50:54PM 0 points [-]

(not sure this is the right answer) Potentially FHI prize competition could be seen as an attempt to pursue that end? ( http://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/prize , it's closed now)

Comment author: Oscar_Cunningham 07 August 2012 01:42:29PM *  2 points [-]

Downvoted for clogging up LessWrong with irrelevant stuff. Have you tried asking them in an email?

Comment author: UngnsCobra 08 August 2012 08:51:08AM 5 points [-]

Yes, i have. I thought there might be other people in the same position, I therefore put up the post in order to potentially "break the ice".

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 07 August 2012 07:30:12PM *  2 points [-]

Renamed to "A question about ...", then somehow the change reverted to the original title (could be an edit by the author), now renamed again (edit log shows both edits, so the first one didn't just fail to register...).

Comment author: UngnsCobra 08 August 2012 08:42:10AM 2 points [-]

Thank you for renaming it.

"then somehow the change reverted to the original title (could be an edit by the author)" - i have not re-dited it back to the original title.

Comment author: MichaelHoward 07 August 2012 01:06:41PM 13 points [-]

Could I suggest a more descriptive title? "Singularity Summit 2012" sounds like it's an announcement from the organizers, or for discussion about the summit in general.

Comment author: UngnsCobra 08 August 2012 08:41:48AM 4 points [-]

My apologise, I did not intend to miss-lead anyone.

Comment author: UngnsCobra 01 April 2012 12:13:19PM 1 point [-]

(I'm sorry about the grammar etc, hope the content comes through) I was 17, when I first had a "burst" of enlightenment, it was more or less the time I started to think critically for myself, coming from a society that I found to be very narrow minded, I at that point felt an urge to read more, learn more and be better. I heavily started to write about my experience's and yielded a great content from it. I naively adopted the notion that: we are what we sculptures us into, our potential is unrealised and too wide and deep to be generalised. With this mantra I came a long way through school, but came out on top without a narrative and started to lack, not being aware of the fact that I was starting to indulge more and more into biases, and the results of my operations started to decline. Then I felt like on a degree of rationality and "winning" I took some steps back. Then around 1.5 years ago in one of my courses at University I started to study the "perception model" and through trajectory I came across books by Nassim Taleb, Malcom Gladwell and finally Bias and Heurestics by Kahneman and Tversky. And after that I have just been rolling along those lines.

Comment author: gwern 11 March 2012 06:20:46PM *  2 points [-]

I don't really know of any myself. It's hard to do economics about such divergent and unclear scenarios, and economists typically do them as jokes (eg. Paul Krugman's paper on investing in a relativistic time travel framework). And there seem to be penalties - that Hanson paper from 2008 still has not been published 4 years later, for example.

Comment author: UngnsCobra 11 March 2012 09:19:27PM 1 point [-]

(To gwern and Will_Newsome) Haha that's great, it's a somewhat juvenile undertone in Krugman's writing in this paper. that's exactly the kind of paper's i'm looking for - paper's that are something of a outlier in the field of economics, if any other paper's come's to mind in the same direction it would be appreciated.

Comment author: Mass_Driver 10 March 2012 06:39:35PM 3 points [-]

Welcome to Less Wrong! Your interests sound interesting. What does it mean to look at the Singularity from an economic point of view?

Comment author: UngnsCobra 11 March 2012 02:15:42PM 2 points [-]

I'm fairly new to singularity etc. but from what I have read so far. Looking at singularity as a if scenario through Brain Emulation's (uploading). How would this affect the economy regarding, emplyment, growth etc. So far I have found papers looking at economics of singularity from Robin Hanson. I'm struggling finding other source's so I would be very grateful if someone would like to contribute.

View more: Next