Does Chapter “You Just Ask Them” in Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman count as academic research? :-)
You got me reading that chapter.
Good link, typo in title, have a good day, thank you for posting on Lesswrong.
Is this comment supposed to be pleasant or unpleasant?
Edit: I asked because "have a good day, thank you for posting" is often used to mean "shut up", but now that I've looked at your past comments, I assume you're being friendly.
Machine learning (in particular, graphical models), more general AI, philosophy, game theory, algorithmic complexity, cognitive science, neuroscience seem to be mostly useless (beyond the basics) for attacking friendliness content problem. Pure mathematics seems potentially useful.
Of the things on your list, I'm most surprised by cognitive science and maybe game theory, unless you're talking about the fields' current insights rather than their expected future insights. In that case, I'm still somewhat surprised game theory is on this list. I'd love to learn what led you to this belief.
It's possible I only know the basics, so feel free to say "read more about what the fields actually offer and it'll be obvious if you've been on Less Wrong long enough."
How much fun should one have?
I thought I specified this with "as often as you need".
Although, after reading your comment it now occurs to me that it could be possible that others might not know how much fun they need. Is that true?
If so, I recommend you explore having an "unlimited" amount of fun without ceasing for days on end (think cliches of "spring break") until you can naturally feel the inflection point at which adding more hedonistic experiences on top of your current pleasure no longer improves your happiness and you long for "relief from recreation". If I'm remembering correctly, this is how I actually calibrated how much fun I need. Once you know this point, you can more naturally feel the bend of your own hedonistic pleasure curve and keep yourself in a state of content, disciplined happiness or slide yourself up towards bliss or down towards more subdued states depending on what's appropriate for the situation.
What kind of fun should one have?
Sex is indeed the correct answer. In some ways, I feel like a chicken-shit for not finding the right way to say this directly in my article. I guess I didn't want to point out sex as an ideal form of recreation since, based on reading comments here on LW, I perceive it as being relatively scarce among some readers. Now that I think of it, my mind actually estimates it as so low that it effectively rounds it down to zero unless I think it through consciously and realize that it can't possibly be that divergent from any other community. Still, I know the pain of being someone who has had sex before, and then being reminded of how awesome sex is without having an outlet for it at the time, and having it leave me feeling unbelievably miserable. I didn't want to leave even a single person reading my article in a place like that.
[ OTOH, if they're down here reading the comments, sorry about that. ]
I guess normally just avoid mentioning sex to people unless I know they're in an abundant sexual situation in life. This heuristic is probably overkill. How do other people deal with this?
I know the pain of being someone who has had sex before, and then being reminded of how awesome sex is without having an outlet for it at the time, and having it leave me feeling unbelievably miserable. I didn't want to leave even a single person reading my article in a place like that.
This thought is very much appreciated.
Also mentioned in the email that went out to the SIAI mailing list, a pledge of monthly donations for the next 12 months counts at the full year's value for purposes of matching.
Because of this, I set up a $50/month pledge (instead of a one-time donation of $500), and I hope this drive causes lots of people to do the same.
If you're interested in how your body works, I recommend Gerald Cizadlo's lectures. They are biology classes for nursing students at an American religious college. Because of his pathophysiology and physiology podcasts, I'm now able to explain the way nerves transmit signals (for example).
(Edited; I originally called nerves insane.)
I just put in 5100 USD, the current balance of my bank account, and I'll find some way to put in more by the end of the challenge.
Large air-conditioned living space, healthy food, both for 2 people (myself and girlfriend). My salary is at rough equilibrium with my spending; I am not saving for retirement. The Bay Area is, generally speaking, expensive.
Is the Singularity Institute supporting her through your salary?
I hope you're not too put out by the rudeness of this question. I've decided that I'm allowed to ask because I'm a (small) donor. I doubt your answer will jeopardize my future donations, whatever it is, but I do have preferences about this.
(Also, it's very good to hear that you're taking health seriously! Not that I expected otherwise.)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
For example, have we heard anything about that big embezzlement?
Good question. And for people who missed it, this refers to money that was reported stolen on SI's tax documents a few years ago. (relevant thread)