Posts

Sorted by New

Wiki Contributions

Comments

My inferences, in descending order of confidence:

(source: it was revealed to me by a neural net)

84559, 79685, 87081, 99819, 37309, 44746, 88815, 58152, 55500, 50377, 69067, 53130.

ofcourse you have to define what deceptions means in it's programming.

That's categorically impossible with the class of models that are currently being worked on, as they have no inherent representation of "X is true". Therefore, they never engage in deliberate deception.

>in order to mistreat 2, 3, or 4, you would have to first mistreat 1

What about deleting all evidence of 1 ever having happened, after it was recorded? 1 hasn't been mistreated, but depending on your assumptions re:consciousness, 2, 3 and 4 may have.

That’s Security Through Obscurity. Also, even if we decided we’re suddenly ok with that, it obviously doesn’t scale well to superhuman agents.

>Some day soon "self-driving" will refer to "driving by yourself", as opposed to "autonomous driving".

Interestingly enough, that's what it was used to mean the first time the term appeared in popular culture, in the film Demolition Man (1993).

We have no idea how to make a useful, agent-like general AI that wouldn't want to disable its off switch or otherwise prevent people from using it.

Global crackdown on the tech industry?

>The aliens sent their message using a continuous transmission channel, like the frequency shift of a pulsar relative to its average or something like that. NASA measured this continuous value and stored the result as floating point data.

 

Then it makes no sense for them to publish it in binary without mentioning the encoding, or making it part of the puzzle to begin with.

Load More