Alexei

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Answer by Alexei106

I looked at your post:

  • I don’t think I ever saw it on the front page. If I did, I don’t think the title would have made it seem worth reading.
  • Reading the first few paragraphs: I’m not sure who this post is for, what problem is it addressing or why should I care in general. It’s referencing some specific chapter out of a book I never heard of.
  • It seems like a long post, so I just skip reading it.

    I hope the suggestions are easy to derive from the above points.

    The writing is not amazing but I didn’t get LLM vibes.

Alexei87

I’d recommend Primer over this.

Alexei40

How do I opt into the LessWrong Watercolor Aesthetic?

Alexei60

I have a personal rule that I tell people when they start bringing this energy into my life: “I’m happy to listen to you for 5 minutes a day on this topic. After that I’m out.”

Alexei20

I’m interested! But I live in Portugal, so it would need to be remote.

Alexei41

The former. I think you can just explain the blinds without explaining the entire poker game.

Alexei46

I like the idea and would consider doing something like that in the future. Thanks! FWIW, I found the explanation of poker completely extraneous to the main point.

Alexei104

Vernor suggested a principle: The bad beings nearly always optimize for engagement, for pulling you ever deeper into their influence. They want to make themselves more firmly a part of your OODA loop. The good ones send you out, away from themselves in an open ended way, but better than before.

That is profound!

Alexei20

Oh, I should clarify that we won't be doing Circling. We'll just be talking.

Load More