To me, "Machine Intelligence" sounds less worn than "Artificial Intelligence", and also seems to more strongly imply that they're talking about general intelligence rather than narrow AI. But I don't know whether those were the actual reasons.
I was under the impression that this use of the word "machine" was archaic -- it was used decades ago for naming things like machine learning, machine translation, and the Association for Computing Machinery. I don't immediately see why a more familiar term wasn't used.
So people just got silly with the IQ field again.
Meetup : Ottawa Weekly Monday LessWrong Meetup
Discussion article for the meetup : Ottawa Weekly Monday LessWrong Meetup
We will be discussing more sections from Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity by Scott Aaronson.
Discussion article for the meetup : Ottawa Weekly Monday LessWrong Meetup
I thought it was nanoweapons, not gray goo, that was the risk of nanotechnology.
well, for discussion, there is
http://lesswrong.com/lw/6nz/approving_reinforces_loweffort_behaviors/
which looks interesting (to me)
Do math contest problems from the different areas of math covered by the IMO and start at your current level of ability and work from there.
Find problems from books, previous contests and forums like Art of Problem Solving.
Is parking easy to find around there?
So does this have anything to do with the Visiting Fellows Program? It isn't a replacement, is it?
Subscribe to RSS Feed
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
It is no longer clear to me what you mean by "taboo." Can you, erm, taboo this?
Any particular reason why you write "erm" even though (I assume) you don't have a British accent?