Comment author: anandjeyahar 22 November 2014 03:54:51PM 0 points [-]

This worked out good enough. We played the Guess the number principle game, tried the wason card test, and planned for future meetup ideas. Here's a set of pics. https://plus.google.com/photos/110235589351841913894/albums/6084556792473790881?banner=pwa . *

  • -- I haven't named/tagged anyone, but if you're still uncomfortable with public sharing pics, let me know on the mailing list.
Comment author: Alsadius 06 November 2014 03:32:25AM *  2 points [-]

Also, I didn't have a digit ratio precise enough to put down, but it seems to be almost exactly 1, possibly slightly higher. (I am unambiguously male, which makes me wonder if my methodology is bad)

Comment author: anandjeyahar 10 November 2014 07:57:42AM 0 points [-]

but it seems to be almost exactly 1, possibly slightly higher. (I am unambiguously male, which makes me wonder if my methodology is bad) Well I had a similar problem(tried to measure with tape directly next & parallel to the fingers) and instead drew the outline of my spread out palm on a sheet of paper and got 1.01.

Comment author: dspeyer 01 November 2014 09:52:29PM 37 points [-]

It’s easier to bear in mind that the map is not the territory when you have two different maps.

--Eric Raymond on the value of bilinguilism

Comment author: anandjeyahar 02 November 2014 04:56:14PM 8 points [-]

This is also the same reason I like Alan Perlis's quote on programming languages. Paraphrased it reads "There's no point in learning a new language that doesn't teach you a new way of thinking." I equate "the new way of thinking" with maps here.

Comment author: anandjeyahar 13 October 2014 10:35:35AM *  0 points [-]

Can we take these discussions to meetup. Am happy to change dates, as it works for me, but last time there was a mess up due to continuous mess-ups.

Comment author: anandjeyahar 13 October 2014 10:40:27AM 0 points [-]

Changed to Nov.15th. I won't be checking this page often. If you want to discuss the actual dates do it on the meetup site link above.

Comment author: AshwinV 11 October 2014 03:33:11PM 0 points [-]

Any weekend would make it easier for me.... Does Nov 2nd sound okay?

Comment author: anandjeyahar 13 October 2014 10:35:35AM *  0 points [-]

Can we take these discussions to meetup. Am happy to change dates, as it works for me, but last time there was a mess up due to continuous mess-ups.

Comment author: anandjeyahar 10 October 2014 04:23:03PM 0 points [-]

Couldn't find a bangalore specific group so started a google group and a meetup group. Here are the links below. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/bangalore-lesswrongers.

http://www.meetup.com/Bangalore-LessWrongers-Meetup/. Have also scheduled a first meetup for Nov. 14th. Let's see how many turn up.

Meetup : Bangalore Meetup

2 anandjeyahar 10 October 2014 12:47AM

Discussion article for the meetup : Bangalore Meetup

WHEN: 22 November 2014 04:10:51PM (+0530)

WHERE: cafe coffee day, old airport road ,Bengaluru

I've registered and created a meetup.com account and a group there. For the first meetup am thinking of Nov.14. (Friday evening). If you would prefer a different date, please post on the meetup group. http://www.meetup.com/Bangalore-LessWrongers-Meetup/events/212529792/

Discussion article for the meetup : Bangalore Meetup

Comment author: Robin 08 July 2014 04:13:29AM 1 point [-]

Rand doesn't deny that emotions are part of rationality, she denies that they are tools of rationality. It is rational to try to make yourself experience positive emotions, but to say "I have a good feeling about this" is not a rational statement, it's an emotional statement. It isn't something that should interfere with cognition.

As for emotions affecting humans behavior, I think all mammals have emotions, so it's not easy for humans to discard them over a few generations of technological evolution. Emotions were useful in the ancestral environment, they are no longer as useful as they once were.

Comment author: anandjeyahar 08 July 2014 06:21:29AM 1 point [-]

The only part I object to what you wrote is * emotions shouldn't interfere with cognition*. I think they already are a part of cognition and it's a bit like calling "quantum physics is weird". Perhaps you meant "emotions shouldn't interfere with rationality" in which case I'll observe that it doesn't seem to be a popular view around lesswrong. Also observe, I used to believe that emotions should be ignored, but later came to the conclusion that it's a way too heavy-handed strategy for the modern world of complex systems. I'll try to conjecture further, by saying, cog, psychologists tend to classify emotion, affect, and moods differently. AFAIK, it's based on the temporal duration it exists with short - long in order of emotion, mood, affect. My conjecture is emotions can and should be ignored, mood can be ignored ( but not necessarily should) and affect should not be ignored, while rational decision-making.

Comment author: Nornagest 21 June 2014 11:58:50PM *  11 points [-]

Relevant to bounded cognition and consequentialism:

"It is better to be just than to be kind, but only good judges can be just; let those who cannot be just be kind."

-- Loyal to the Group of Seventeen, The Citadel of the Autarch, Gene Wolfe

Comment author: anandjeyahar 26 June 2014 09:45:59AM 3 points [-]

While some parts of me agree with it, there are other parts that set off alarms like: but judges will try to use this as a rationalization for what looks like a kind behaviour(by habit, social proof) instead of trying to evaluate the justness, especially when it looks like it's complex or is likely to threaten one of their biased beliefs.

Comment author: anandjeyahar 21 June 2014 01:23:16PM 1 point [-]

Oh well nobody showed up.. Guess nobody was interested. If am wrong someone else post another meetup. Thanks. Cya.. Anand

View more: Prev | Next