Comment author: anonymous7 06 January 2008 10:31:54AM 2 points [-]

Ironically, in the future we might learn that the first replicator required "chance" in the same order of magnitude.

Comment author: anonymous7 26 December 2007 12:33:16PM 8 points [-]

90% of drivers can be better than the average.

Comment author: anonymous7 04 December 2007 08:41:06PM -1 points [-]

Tom, I did not confuse ends and means.

Comment author: anonymous7 04 December 2007 05:51:47PM 0 points [-]

The problem with Communism is timing. In the future (if we survive the next century) there will be enough technological progression to create essential Communism (no-one needs to work, everyone will have necessary resources to live incredible lives and so forth). Of course, we won't call it Communism.

Comment author: anonymous7 04 November 2007 10:09:31AM 0 points [-]

Computing power is also increasing exponentially.

In response to Science as Attire
Comment author: anonymous7 24 August 2007 11:07:01AM 0 points [-]

Eliezer, are you unaware of the fact that biological evolution is only a subset from general evolution?

In response to Science as Attire
Comment author: anonymous7 23 August 2007 05:42:16AM 1 point [-]

Even if biological evolution would allow one-generation mutation for "Storm abilities", it would not equal that evolution doesn't explain anything. Even if everything "is possible" in evolution, there can still be different probabilities for different outcomes. The probability for "Storm ability mutation" is non-zero.

View more: Prev