I have not played Secret Hitler specifically, but in similar games (Mafia and Resistance) it is not in fact the case that members of the majority team should immediately share all information, and some of the best plays I've seen have involved members of the majority bluffing the minority.
(With that said, everyone following both of the first two bullets on your list above seems like clearly not a Nash equilibrium).
...but now the winner is a four-and-a-half-way tie. Just take the credit, it'll be neater. :P
My current accusations of which wizards have been causing[1] disease.
VERY SIMPLE LINKAGES:
INTERMEDIATE LINKAGES:
COMPLEX LINKAGES:
Obviously, no-one would be this offended by people curing disease for free! Rather, it seems clear that the Calderians have some customary circumlocutions around speaking of spreading plague, in order to not bring down the attention of the Pallid Princess, She Who Arises In Filth. We should interpret this whole dataset as about problems caused rather than problems healed, but we shouldn't say that directly to the Calderians.
There seems to be some pattern in when these mages affect the clockwise sector and when the counter-clockwise, but I don't know what it is. It might match e.g. phase of moon, but not neatly enough that I can easily work it out.
Fusion is also a thing. A glass of tap water contains (admittedly a very small amount) of deuterium.
Would you define 'nuclear weapon' as 'anything not produced in a way that verifiably could not contain any nuclear material'?
(Keep in mind that this would categorize e.g. a glass of tap water as a nuclear weapon.)
To the extent that these things are problems, they are both problems today. There are insular Amish communities that shut out as much modern culture as they can, and hikkikomori living alone with their body pillows.
AI may exacerbate the existing issues, but on the whole I don't feel like the world is drastically worsened by the presence of these groups.
This might be downstream of a deliberate decision by designers.
An LLM has been trained on data through February 2025.
A user asks it a question in June 2025 about 'what happened in May?'
How should the LLM respond?
(I wish to register that I didn't miss this scenario, and intend to get around to playing it this weekend...it's just that you made the awful indie-game blunder of releasing your game the day after Silksong came out, and my free time has been somewhat spoken for for the past few days).
In some other world somewhere, the foremost Confucian scholars are debating how to endow their AI with filial piety.
I feel like this paragraph should at least mention the whole 'they have already accidentally leaked all your data' thing.