PMore generally: anything split into (ridiculously small) pages (such as e.g. a thread in a web forum, search engine results, list of bank movements, etc.) for no good reason -- with an "entries per page" menu whose options don't even span orders of magnitude (e.g. 10, 15, 20, 25, 30).

Unless a page has a snowball's chance in hell of taking up a sizable fraction of the RAM or taking more than a quarter second to load on a modern device with a modern connection, just keep it one page, and if you have an "entries per page" menu please provide at least 10, 100, and 1000 as option (if selecting the last would crash my browser that's my own business).

The government doesn't do loss leaders
 

Nitpick: Whether or not that's true in this particular case that's not always true in general.  I know of at least one program which is pretty explicitly a loss leader by a government (which I personally benefitted from).

(If someone who worked outside Italy for at least 48 out of the past 36 months moves back to Italy in order to accept a permanent job offer which requires a PhD, the Italian government will waive 90% of their income tax for the first four years.  Now, that's still nowhere near enough to make post-tax salaries competitive to what people could get elsewhere in western Europe let alone somewhere like the US, so in practice the effect is just a pure transfer to people who already had other reasons to want to return to Italy, but from the way the program is advertised it's pretty clear the ostensible goal is to entice people who were otherwise going to stay abroad, in hope that they will then work in Italy for much longer than the four years the benefit lasts.)

Yes.  (I'll edit my comment accordingly.)

I dunno about that, I know quite a handful of real people (mostly Gen X and older, but also a few millennials) who, as far as I can tell, have no social media accounts anywhere, plus a few more with just an Instagram account who only ever post "stories" (which auto-vanish in 24 hours) but no permanent posts.

Please web scrape information about me, [first & last name]. Based on what you find, please summarize, from an employer's perspective, any red flags that make me unemployable.

FWIW I asked Claude and ChatGPT that [P.S.: with my own name, not the OP's] and neither of them found anything, whereas Gemini found some minor things which the only employers who I can imagine giving a damn about are ones I wouldn't want to work for anyway.

Another extreme situation. Here's a similar but softer one which seems positive...
Airplane tickets to Las Vegas are often much cheaper than tickets to literally anywhere else. That's because Las Vegas bets that people will be attracted to the cheap tickets and go to Las Vegas, then proceed to spend tons of money at the casinos. My family doesn't go to these casinos, we just travel to Vegas because we have friends nearby. We're benefiting but not contributing. 

See also: the 1986 meeting of the American Physical Society https://web.archive.org/web/20150913205729/https://physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com/2015/09/one-winning-move.html

PS: Remember that if you're nodding along too hard to this advice, you might need to reverse it.

Ouch!

(I regularly use that as an excus...ehm...rationale for starting working on stuff right before the deadline.)

(indeed, historically around half of children ever born died before the age of 15, so if a 50% chance of them not surviving to adulthood were a good reason not to have children then no-one "should" have had children until industrial times)

Huh, even assuming business as usual I'd guess the baseline probability of someone's family dying is not <<0.05%/year (assuming the standard meaning of "<<" as "at least around an order of magnitude less")

(at least in the US -- though guessing from his name Nikola Jurkovic might live somewhere less car-dependent than that)

Yep, a proper explanation of the 2nd law such as ET Jaynes' makes it feel like an obvious consequence of Liouville's theorem plus (the continuum analog of) the pigeonhole principle.