Comment author: aurellem 26 November 2013 08:39:02PM 2 points [-]

We ended up winning the contest, so thanks for your help everyone!

Comment author: gwern 20 November 2013 10:01:10PM 2 points [-]

7PM... Is that China time? Or England time?

Comment author: aurellem 20 November 2013 11:51:06PM 1 point [-]

EST. Thanks for pointing that out.

Comment author: V_V 14 November 2013 12:16:07PM -2 points [-]

Smells fishy. You can budget $100,000 for the prize but you don't have the money necessary to run the tests needed to administer it?

Comment author: aurellem 14 November 2013 02:38:01PM 1 point [-]

See http://lesswrong.com/r/lesswrong/lw/j1j/help_the_brain_preservation_foundation/a1ns, my previous comment. Is there something there that you still feel "smells fishy"?

Comment author: ChristianKl 13 November 2013 07:03:58PM 2 points [-]

I counts on the fact that it will gain the donation it needs in time to administer everything.

Comment author: aurellem 13 November 2013 08:34:09PM *  22 points [-]

There are two pools of money for the prize:

The first is the $100,000 prize purse which we have secured. This is not money we have on hand, but is instead money that we have a binding legal access to in the event that the prize is won. Like the million dollars for the Ansari X prize, the prize purse money only materializes when the prize is won. We can't use it or access it now, and even if we could, it would be dubious morally, as you say.

The other pool is the General Fund, which we use to fund lab time, disposables involved in electron microscopy, travel costs, etc, with with main cost being equipment/lab time for evaluation. The general fund is much smaller then the prize purse currently, and while we do have enough money to perform several evaluations, we need more money to help us with outreach and the inevitable roadblocks we will face while administering the prize.

Bottom line is that the prize purse is separate from the general fund, and the general fund is quite lean. While we currently have enough money to run the prize (most likely), more money will help us with inevitable setbacks, and also play a critical role in helping us to promote the prize and even recruit new competitors.

Comment author: aurellem 12 November 2013 08:25:42PM 1 point [-]

I think a good way to ensure that you will be able to be revived sucessfully is to take matters into your own hands and work on improving brain preservation technology / awarness right now. For example, you could volunteer or otherwise help out the Brain Preservation Foundation (http://www.brainpreservation.org/). Or help out research into this technology directly. As we get more information about preservation and how it works (and why it doesn't), it will become more obvious what you can do personally to get a better preservation.

Comment author: aurellem 12 November 2013 08:18:38PM 4 points [-]

Hi, my name is Robert McIntyre. I'm a graduate researcher at MIT studying AI. I am also a volunteer for the Brain Preservation Foundation (http://www.brainpreservation.org/) You can vote for us to win charity money here (http://on.fb.me/15XFdTG).