Comment author: blashimov 29 April 2013 06:24:36AM 2 points [-]

[link] XKCD on saving time; http://xkcd.com/1205/ Image URL (for hotlinking/embedding): http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/is_it_wor Though it will probably be mostly unseen as the month is about to end.

Comment author: PrawnOfFate 10 April 2013 05:46:51PM -2 points [-]

Not the world, the US.

Comment author: blashimov 11 April 2013 04:40:58PM 2 points [-]
  1. Sure, in this case.
  2. The US is part of the world.
  3. I was expressing my thoughts on a general and common failure mode that I have attempted to correct, and that this article provides evidence I have failed to do so.
Comment author: NancyLebovitz 16 February 2013 12:44:41PM 4 points [-]

Thanks for the details.

Can you see how this sort of thing, applied through a whole educational career, would tend to discourage learning and accomplishment?

Even if it's true (at least until transhumanism really gets going) that the best mathematicians will always be men, it's not as though second rank mathematicians are useless.

Comment author: blashimov 09 April 2013 04:41:29PM 0 points [-]

It seems to me that, given people are already sexist, and given that telling someone their group has a lower average directly lowers their performance, such a re-weighting should never ever be used.

Comment author: blashimov 09 April 2013 04:21:31AM 17 points [-]

I would dearly like citations for everything - I would really like to know if I am still terrible at estimating how awful the world is.

Comment author: shminux 12 February 2013 02:27:52AM 1 point [-]

Why?

Comment author: blashimov 12 February 2013 07:04:16AM 1 point [-]

You might be remembering the times you are correct more clearly than the times you are wrong.

Comment author: Wei_Dai 16 January 2013 01:15:21PM 2 points [-]

Another interpretation: Try to figure out which side has more intelligent defenders and control for that when evaluating arguments.

Isn't the real problem here that the author of the quote was asking the wrong question, namely "Mormonism or non-Mormon Christianity?" when he should have been asking "Theism or atheism?" I don't see how controlling for which side had the more intelligent defenders in the former debate would have helped him better get to the truth. (I mean that may well be the right thing to do in general, but this doesn't seem to be a very good example for illustrating it.)

Comment author: blashimov 30 January 2013 01:41:01AM 0 points [-]

That may be too much to ask for. Besides, if the horse evidence had worked, you'd be forced to turn around and apply it to Jesus...it may not have worked for her, but it has worked on some theists.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 17 January 2013 06:56:00PM 0 points [-]

Parents (or contemporaries of parents) who turn out to be surprisingly wise are a staple of a certain kind of YA fiction.

Comment author: blashimov 18 January 2013 11:29:42AM 0 points [-]

I wonder if this is a slight reaction to another kind of YA fiction, in which adults are useless, often from stupidity.

Comment author: blashimov 13 January 2013 07:53:31AM *  11 points [-]

I have always had an animal fear of death, a fate I rank second only to having to sit through a rock concert. My wife tries to be consoling about mortality and assures me that death is a natural part of life, and that we all die sooner or later. Oddly this news, whispered into my ear at 3 a.m., causes me to leap screaming from the bed, snap on every light in the house and play my recording of “The Stars and Stripes Forever” at top volume till the sun comes up.

-Woody Allen EDIT: Fixed formatting.

Comment author: J_Taylor 28 December 2012 03:08:20AM 0 points [-]

She quotes textbooks word for word, all the time.

I am having difficulty finding evidence of this. Could you perhaps give an example? (Ideally, a passage from the book.)

Comment author: blashimov 28 December 2012 04:49:10AM 0 points [-]

Yeesh, I know she at least once remembered the right section and page, then read from the book, and I feel like she's quoted books before, but darned if I can find it easily.

Comment author: Error 20 December 2012 10:27:20PM 1 point [-]

Well, it doesn't say you have to win quickly.

I was skeptical at first, but consider it this way: At each step you make a subtree simpler, and then insert an arbitrary number of copies of the simpler subtree. Eventually you must end up with a large number of copies of the simplest possible subtree, a single node off the root. Those don't grow the hydra when removed, so you you chop them all off and then win.

I found I could see this intuitively if I chopped the top-most head of the most-complex tree for the first several rounds, in most configurations; you'll see whatever tree you're working on get wider, but shorter. It helps to lower the starting number of nodes to 7 or so, as well.

Comment author: blashimov 25 December 2012 05:28:03AM 0 points [-]

Yes, while it was clear on a second reading this was also clear, thanks.

View more: Prev | Next