Comment author: boredstudent 12 February 2013 08:07:40AM *  4 points [-]

I found 1

Comment author: chemotaxis101 21 February 2013 03:56:32PM 1 point [-]

Many thanks.

Comment author: beriukay 10 February 2013 02:03:35PM 4 points [-]

I could only get 2 and 4.

Comment author: chemotaxis101 21 February 2013 03:55:49PM 1 point [-]

Thanks!

Comment author: lukeprog 21 February 2013 02:04:32PM 0 points [-]
Comment author: chemotaxis101 21 February 2013 03:40:35PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: diegocaleiro 21 February 2013 09:37:44AM 0 points [-]

Edited. Thanks! Non-native language question: "I'm interested in expanding on this." implies you are interested in doing research or writing a post about this, or that you are interested in reading an expansion on this by the author (me)?

Comment author: chemotaxis101 21 February 2013 10:05:03AM 1 point [-]

I suppose he's interested in generally discussing the above-mentioned point.

Comment author: chemotaxis101 20 February 2013 02:33:54PM 2 points [-]

Trying to get a job and noticing more accurately what the market looks like [I'd be glad if someone pointed to the article in which willnewsome talks about making money, circa 2010]

(Virtual) Employment Open Thread

Comment author: chemotaxis101 10 February 2013 01:34:42PM *  0 points [-]

1) Aided and unaided decision making: improving intuitive judgement. Journal of Forecasting. Volume 1, Issue 4, pages 349–363, October/December 1982.

2) Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: a design science approach. Information Systems Journal. Volume 16, Issue 1, pages 55–78, January 2006.

3) Cognitive biases in the use of computer-based decision support systems. Omega. Volume 17, Issue 4, 1989, Pages 335–344.

4) Debiasing investors with decision support systems: an experimental investigation. Decision Support Systems. Volume 46, Issue 1, December 2008, Pages 399–410.

Comment author: chemotaxis101 10 February 2013 12:54:52PM 0 points [-]

Goal programming and cognitive biases in decision-making. Journal of the Operational Research Society (2005) 56, 1166–1175.

View more: Prev