Comment author: SquirrelInHell 17 June 2016 08:45:30AM 1 point [-]

Yes, Berlin is the most obvious candidate at this point, and it seems strong on most fronts except climate and prices.

Note that cheap flights make "not be too far from any other country" much less important than it used to be.

That's why I think Berlin is a wonderful choice

Note that saying "X. That's why I think Y" is a straightforward transformation of "I think Y, because X", which I've been asking not to say.

As an exercise in consequentialist thinking, I suggest you rephrase your comment :)

Comment author: compartmentalization 12 July 2016 10:03:02PM *  0 points [-]

except climate

Care to elaborate?

prices

It seems to be cheaper than anything west and north of it, except the Baltics. Going by the prices listed here.

Comment author: MrMind 24 June 2016 02:47:59PM *  0 points [-]

Have you added the important note after I made the comment or I just missed it totally? Anyway:

If the European Base is going to be Berlin, members of a larger group of nations will be able to attend, due to the position being almost central from any other European countries. The community that is going to be developed there, as an entity nested inside the German government / culture / etc., will benefit from less ostracism and a wider acceptance even in its weirder facets (cryonics / poly...) thus enabling a better freedom of movement / speech / publications, etc.

Comment author: compartmentalization 12 July 2016 10:00:24PM 0 points [-]

Good (frequent/cheap) flight connections are more important than location itself. Flying e.g. from Tallinn to Athens takes about 5 hours (about 3 hours of actual flight time).

Comment author: DanArmak 12 March 2016 09:55:55PM *  0 points [-]

RTS is special because it's realtime. An AI that's only 'good enough' in terms of strategy or tactics could still win by being far better at parallelizing and reaction speed. The bigger the game world, the more this is true.

Human Starcraft players need to have a basic skill of taking hundreds of actions per minute before they can bring their superior strategy or tactics into play.

Comment author: compartmentalization 13 March 2016 12:42:15AM 2 points [-]

being far better at parallelizing and reaction speed

Something like this?

Comment author: ZoltanBerrigomo 14 January 2016 03:41:38AM *  0 points [-]

I guess I am willing to bite the bullet and say that, as long as entity X prefers existence to nonexistence, you have done it no harm by bringing it into being. I realize this generates a number of repulsive-sounding conclusions, e.g., it becomes ethical to create entities which will live, by our 21st century standards, horrific lives.

At least some of them will tell you they had rather not been born.

If one is willing to accept my reasoning above, I think one can take one more leap and say that statistically as long as the vast majority of these entities will prefer existing to never having been brought into being, we are in the clear.

Comment author: compartmentalization 14 January 2016 05:06:59PM 1 point [-]

If you use the entities' preferences to decide what's ethical, then everything is (or can be), because you can just adjust their preferences accordingly.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 03 January 2016 05:52:10PM *  5 points [-]

In the LW Slack an online test by the Birkbeck University of London for prosopagnosia (face blindness) was posted and some took it. The Test says that 80% is population average and below 60% means possible face-blindness (and I guess 33% means random answers). The results posted in the LW slack show an average below 70% (for 10 values) and the hypothesis was offered that the LW populace in not neuro-typical in this regard. How about verifying this?

Take test test here.

My test result (give percentage points as reported by the test in range 0..100; use 80 if you absolutely don't want to do the test):

ADDED: This test takes about 20min according to its intro and some say that it takes longer (see below).

Submitting...

Comment author: compartmentalization 06 January 2016 12:36:38AM 3 points [-]

Can't vote, not enough karma. Got 79%.

Comment author: turchin 18 October 2015 06:33:00PM 1 point [-]

I think it strongly depends of type of spices. Curcumin (carry) is known to be benefitial, while peper is known to be cancerogenic. So someone could have beneficial spices

Comment author: compartmentalization 03 November 2015 11:48:45PM 0 points [-]

Short search for "black pepper carcinogenicity" doesn't turn up anything except a few studies on rats and mice, and one of them shows no adverse effect. Do you have anything better?

Comment author: ChristianKl 09 April 2015 01:09:46PM 2 points [-]

Performance prediction is a bit tricky. You usually care more about the performance than being accurate at predicting. You don't want to come into a situation where you reduce your performance to get your prediction right.

Comment author: compartmentalization 08 June 2015 10:30:46PM 0 points [-]

This is the reason I have mixed feelings about making predictions of events that I can influence. I'm curious whether there is any research about this 'jinxing' - does predicting low chances of success at a task make people less likely to succeed? Or (maybe) the opposite?