Very simple idea, but I thought it'd be worth making a post on this. Some people are saying AI will make all goods cheaper, so you'll be able to afford a nicer life by working. Without any redistribution, just by market mechanisms. These people are wrong. AI will lower the...
Just recently had this idea, pulling it out of comments so it gets more visibility. Jessicata pointed me to a game proposed by Wichardt in 2008. I'll paste her summary: > suppose Alice has 2 copies, who have the same source code and who can randomize independently. There are 2...
It seems fairly likely that the first powerful AIs will be instruction-following rather than value-aligned, and will be controlled by a small number of people. So it makes sense to worry what individual people might do with such immense power. Here intuitions diverge and careful analysis is scarce. This post...
I think consequentialism describes only a subset of my wishes. For example, maximizing money is well modeled by it. But when I'm playing with something, it's mostly about the process, not the end result. Or when I want to respect the wishes of other people, I don't really know what...
Problems in population ethics (are 2 lives at 2 utility better than 1 life at 3 utility?) are similar to problems about lifespan of a single person (is it better to live 2 years with 2 utility per year than 1 year with 3 utility per year?) On the surface,...
The Quincunx is a 1989 novel by Charles Palliser, set in early 1800s England. I want to recommend it to everyone because it's really good, and it might be relevant to the AI transition. Let me try to explain. The surface level of the book is a kind of mishmash...
There's a long-standing and possibly unsolvable puzzle about how AIs should behave in game-theoretic situations with each other. The simplest example is the Ultimatum Game, where player A proposes how a dollar should be split between A and B, and B either accepts or rejects. In case of rejection both...