Comment author: Lumifer 30 September 2015 05:07:07PM 2 points [-]

But it's all stuff that's easier with two humans than one

Here is an example of two humans: a mother and a grandmother. This works?

Comment author: dankuck 30 September 2015 05:30:25PM 0 points [-]

Yes, definitely. It's very much a question of someone's situation whether they have additional persons or they need to find some.

Comment author: anon85 29 September 2015 11:25:00PM 9 points [-]

The secretary problem is way overused, and very rarely has any application in practice. This is because it maximizes the probability of finding the best match, and NOT the expectation over the utility of the match your get. This is almost never what you want in practice; in practice, you don't care much between a match with utility 1000 and a match with utility 999, you just want to avoid a match with utility -1000.

Comment author: dankuck 30 September 2015 05:08:32PM 1 point [-]

Does the secretary problem say anything about getting the second-best match? That seems to be the crux and this is the counter-argument I'm most swayed by.

Comment author: Lumifer 30 September 2015 03:22:48PM 2 points [-]

You think it's mostly a matter of money?

Comment author: dankuck 30 September 2015 05:02:42PM 0 points [-]

It's definitely more than money. But it's all stuff that's easier with two humans than one.