In response to 30 day karma
Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 24 August 2011 11:43:50PM *  0 points [-]

(By the way, if I'm not mistaken, my Karma dropped exactly 100 points the moment this change rolled out. Possibly a symptom of some counting bug in the new (or old) version?)

Comment author: drpowell 25 August 2011 04:29:36AM 0 points [-]

Strange. The calculation for total Karma has not been touched by these recent changes.

In response to 30 day karma
Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 24 August 2011 11:36:32PM *  15 points [-]

Since Yudkowsky's 30-day Karma is currently 6055, and he hasn't posted that much over the last month, the answer must be "all votes on all posts within the past 30 days, regardless of the age of the post or comment".

This doesn't look that useful, I think it should only count votes on recent posts/comments. Also, this measure, if amended this way, looks informative enough to allow an option of viewing a longer list of active contributors, which could be linked to from caption of the sidebar section, like with "recent posts".

Comment author: drpowell 25 August 2011 04:28:34AM 7 points [-]

I think this is sensible. I've changed the code to only include articles and comments from the last 30 days. (The side box may not update immediately as your browser is likely to do some caching.)

Comment author: drpowell 17 August 2011 12:45:49AM 15 points [-]

Mea culpa. I hastily pushed that commit as there was a broken article on production that needed a hot fix. Embarrassingly, in my haste I deployed before the tests finished. Should be fixed now.

Recent Less Wrong downtime

23 drpowell 18 July 2011 04:50AM

Many users may have noticed that Less Wrong experienced about 6 hours of downtime on 16/7/2011.

CAUSE: The server was put under an unusual amount of load and started up a new instance to load-balance the traffic.  Unfortunately, there was a bug in the script that starts the new instance that caused it to use an inconsistent mix of old and new code.  The symptom seen by users was that any post with comments was inaccessible.

RESPONSE: A hotfix was deployed as soon as the problem was detected, unfortunately it was a Saturday so this reponse time was slower than we would like.  We have since implemented a proper fix for the particular bug that caused this problem.  We are also creating some extra monitoring probes so we'll be notified promptly of any similar problems in the future.

Apologies for the inconvenience.

Comment author: Dreaded_Anomaly 06 July 2011 04:56:19AM 0 points [-]

I am glad to see continuing work on the site.

Bug: the "continue this thread" link is not positioned correctly: Firefox 5 screenshot. (Behavior in Chrome 12 was pixel-for-pixel identical.)

Comment author: drpowell 15 July 2011 04:34:38AM 1 point [-]

This should now be positioned correctly.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 July 2011 11:42:53AM 0 points [-]

It's still there on the About page.

In response to comment by [deleted] on Recent site changes, Mon 4th July
Comment author: drpowell 08 July 2011 11:50:42AM 0 points [-]
Comment author: NancyLebovitz 06 July 2011 02:33:32PM 1 point [-]

I don't know whether it's got anything to do with the site changes, but LW has become less reliable about opening links. I'm getting those joke error messages relatively often, though I can usually get the link to work on a second try. I just got some sort of proxy error the first time I tried to open recent discussion posts.

Comment author: drpowell 07 July 2011 06:54:55AM 0 points [-]

There was an issue that at random intervals would cause that error page to be returned. It should be fixed now.

Comment author: drpowell 07 July 2011 06:46:57AM *  2 points [-]

CAPTCHAs were broken for the last 24 hours, they should be working now.