Comment author: someonewrongonthenet 24 December 2014 05:33:29AM 2 points [-]

I strongly suspect the real list of most important habits and skills fall within running, weight training, and cooking, but this is not the forum I'd typically go for advice on those topics.

Comment author: edanm 24 December 2014 08:19:35AM 1 point [-]

I agree. Perhaps this should be qualified as "most important habits that are only recommended in the Rationality community". Otherwise there are plenty of other skills we can add (another example - start saving money early, etc).

Comment author: edanm 22 December 2014 02:18:46PM 1 point [-]

Backed!!

This is amazing news, both that the book is coming along, and that there will be a professional Audiobook version. This will make it easier to spread the sequences, and may even mean that I'll actually finish the sequences myself, something I still haven't done.

Btw, two logistical questions (for Luke mostly): 1. Was there any similar campaign for the book version? 2. I understand that MIRI isn't paying for this Audiobook version? I ask because my donations to MIRI are now employer-matched, as are I assume other people's, but this Kickstarter campaign can't be employer-matched afaik, which is a shame and a "waste" of potential donation. Any way around this? (I also donate to MIRI, but I want to specifically donate for this Audiobook being made).

Comment author: edanm 22 December 2014 02:09:06PM *  11 points [-]

Something I'm looking for:

A list of habits to take up, to improve my life, that are vetted and recommended by the community. Preferably in order of most useful to least useful. Things like "start using Anki", "start meditating", etc.

Do we have list like this compiled? If not, can we create it? I'm a big believe in the things this community recommends, and have already taken up using Anki, am working on Meditation, and am looking for what other habits I should take up.

FYI, I thought of this as I was reading gwern's Dual N-Back article, in which he mentions it's probably not worth the time, as there are much higher-potential activities to do.

(Here's the relevant excerpt from gwern: N-BACK IN GENERAL

To those whose time is limited: you may wish to stop reading here. If you seek to improve your life, and want the greatest ‘bang for the buck’, you are well-advised to look elsewhere. Meditation, for example, is easier, faster, and ultra-portable. Typing training will directly improve your facility with a computer, a valuable skill for this modern world. Spaced repetition memorization techniques offer unparalleled advantages to students. Nootropics are the epitome of ease (just swallow!), and their effects are much more easily assessed - one can even run double-blind experiments on oneself, impossible with dual N-back. Other supplements like melatonin can deliver benefits incommensurable with DNB - what is the cognitive value of another number in working memory thanks to DNB compared to a good night’s sleep thanks to melatonin? Modest changes to one’s diet and environs can fundamentally improve one’s well-being. Even basic training in reading, with the crudest tachistoscope techniques, can pay large dividends if one is below a basic level of reading like 200WPM & still subvocalizing. And all of these can start paying off immediately.)

Comment author: edanm 02 November 2014 03:58:36PM 30 points [-]

Did the survey. It felt much shorter this year.

Comment author: JoshuaFox 02 November 2014 12:11:53PM *  22 points [-]

LessWrong-Tel Aviv members Dan Armak, Adam Mesha, Yonatan Cale, and I contributed to MIRI/CfAR in honor of Edan Maor's marriage to Sami Wexsel.

We encourage all LessWrongers to consider more donation in honor of friends' special events. It's a great way to get triple fuzzies: You, the honoree, and the wider community get to feel good about it.

Comment author: edanm 02 November 2014 02:59:34PM 12 points [-]

(I'm Edan Maor)

Thanks a lot to all of you! I really appreciate both getting a gift, and the way you did it - I agree with you in wishing that more people would make donations as a gift.

You guys made my day! :)

Comment author: edanm 30 June 2014 09:16:05PM 5 points [-]

I'm not sure where, but I remember Eliezer writing something like ~"one of the biggest advances in the economy is the fact that people have internalized that they should invest their money, instead of having it lying around".

I'm looking for 2 things: 1. Does anyone remember where this was written? My google-fu is failing me at the moment. 2. Can anyone point me to any economic literature that talks about this?

Comment author: edanm 28 June 2014 04:58:56PM 1 point [-]

Question for anyone that's taking the course: is it worthwhile for the average LW'er? I assume most of us have an above-average familiarity with these topics.

Comment author: Qiaochu_Yuan 14 June 2014 03:23:54AM 1 point [-]

Paper. Calendars. Smartphones. Asking other people for advice.

Comment author: edanm 15 June 2014 09:20:19AM 0 points [-]

Isn't that just technological progress? Except for asking people for advice, nothing else there changes how people think, so it's hard to call it a rationality technique IMO.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 07 June 2014 08:50:47PM *  1 point [-]

I'm trying to convince intelligent people that there are real changes we can introduce that will be adopted by most people

Well you can start with trying to convince me then. If we can't get people to stop playing the lottery, what makes you think we can get them to understand and correctly apply Bayes' Rule? BTW, I hope you don't have the bottom line already written here.

Comment author: edanm 09 June 2014 07:37:45AM 1 point [-]

I believe there are meaningful things people believe/do nowadays that they didn't 300 years ago (e.g. using the scientific method).

Unfortunately, for all these things, they're either: a) adopted only by some people, not the majority. b) As DanArmak says, adopted only because of "peer pressure" or other social reasons.

Now, that's not to say CFAR's mission isn't still worthwhile - raising the sanity waterline of just certain segments of the population, e.g. the top X% in terms of intelligence, is still of great importance.

But if there really aren't general "rationality techniques" that have been adopted by most people, if the average person today is no more rational than a person 500 years ago, then I suppose you're right - my bottom line might need to change to "maybe we can't reach the general populace".

Comment author: DanArmak 07 June 2014 04:03:52PM 5 points [-]

I think we should make an important distinction here: why do people adopt en masse new beliefs and behaviors, rational or not?

Do they adopt them because they become convinced of their truth, or by considering the evidence for and against them? Or do they adopt them for the same reasons they adopted the irrational ideas they are replacing - through cultural effects, following prestigious leaders and popular opinion?

I am not, by the way, trying to denigrate consensus-following. It's quite a good heuristic. But it's not what we usually mean by "rational behavior"; it is more nearly instinctive than conscious.

Comment author: edanm 08 June 2014 11:33:27AM 1 point [-]

That's a very good point, although I think a good a first stage is to find what techniques people are actually using, then try and understand why.

View more: Prev | Next