For me the 0th rule of rational dialogue is common assumption of commitment to the finding the truth together. That's a belief in your audience's sincere interest in the truth and capacity for it. In their book, Nate and Eliazer seem to fail that standard with rhetorical sappers like "bitter...
Alternatively, what single concept from statistics would most improve people's interpretations of popular news and daily life events?
I've only ever seen publication bias taught with made-up or near-miss examples. Has anyone got a really well-documented case in which: * (About) nine people independently get the idea for the same experiment because it seems like it should be there, and they all see that nothing has been published...
I have this belief that humility is a part of good critical thinking, and that egoism undermines it. I imagine arrogance as a kind of mind-death. But I have no evidence, and no good mechanism by which it might be true. In fact, I know the belief is suspect because...