Comment author: Viliam_Bur 16 July 2014 12:36:56PM 15 points [-]

At low status, your flaws are given prime focus and your assets, while acknowledged, dismissed as unimportant or countered with “yes, buts” which turn any positive trait into a negative. (...) If you are in a position where people emphasize your flaws and overlook your achievements, you have low social status (...). If the opposite is true, you have high social status.

A big part of the problem is that programmers are constantly trying to one-up each other (...) and prove their superior knowledge, drive, and intelligence. From the outside (that is, from the vantage point of the business operators we work for) these pissing contests make all sides look stupid and deficient. By lowering each others’ status so reliably, and when little to nothing is at stake, programmers lower their status as a group.

When we like our work, we let it be known. We work extremely hard. (...) This means the happy ones don’t get the raises and promotions they deserve (because they’re working so hard) because management sees no need to reward them, and that the unhappy ones stand out to aggressive management as potential “performance issues”. (...) we allow this “passion” to be used against us. Not to be passionate is almost a crime, especially in startups. (...) What most of us don’t realize is that this culture of mandatory “passion” lowers our social status, because it encourages us to work unreasonably hard and irrespective of conditions.

Executives, a more savvy sort, lose passion when denied the advancement or consideration they feel they deserve. (...) They want to be seen as supremely competent, but not sacrificial. (...) Executives are out for themselves and relatively open about the fact. (...) What executives understand, almost intuitively, is reciprocity. (...) They won’t fall into “love of the craft” delusions when “the craft” doesn’t love them back.

I believe there is an imporant lesson in this. I emphasise this part because it's not just "managers have it better than programmers", but it tries to explain why; what are the mistakes to avoid.

The core problem is probably the servant attitude: "I will do my best, and hope that my master will notice! And if he doesn't, then I will work even harder to show what a good servant I am!" This doesn't work, because it gives the master exactly zero motivation to do anything; he is already getting from you whatever he wants. What's the point of giving you more money or better working conditions, if in return you are going to do exactly the same thing you were already doing?

Your negotiation doesn't have to end at the job interview.

Comment author: iceman 16 July 2014 08:14:43PM *  7 points [-]

This doesn't work, because it gives the master exactly zero motivation to do anything; he is already getting from you whatever he wants.

Or to put it in local game theory terms: Your boss is significantly more likely to be PrudentBot than FairBot, and PrudentBot defects against CooperateBot.

Comment author: iceman 10 June 2014 08:58:33PM 9 points [-]

At work, I launched the project that I've been working on for the last two years, which deleted over 100,000 lines of unmaintained legacy code and I got promoted for doing so.

In response to Ergonomics Revisited
Comment author: diegocaleiro 22 April 2014 10:01:15PM *  12 points [-]

Have Two Screens

The only advice I feel qualified to give is this one. Having two screens is immensely better.

Comment author: iceman 22 April 2014 11:20:42PM 2 points [-]

I am moving in the other direction. I currently have two screens and am going back to a single big one. There doesn't seem to be great support for whether two monitors make us more productive. (That said, measuring pixels is also probably not really looking at what's really important here.)

I will once again plug the Kinesis Advantage keyboards; I've used them for over seven years now. I previously had really bad RSI and it's now rare that I get any pain in my wrists at all.

Comment author: HatCloak 24 December 2013 03:52:50PM *  18 points [-]

This is my point. This a hundred or a thousand times over. That story, and the story of Emily and Control, and all his posts about conceptual superweapons, and the non-central fallacy, and so on and so on for a hundred or a thousand nuggets of awesomeness. That is why I make my plea.

Comment author: iceman 24 December 2013 04:49:45PM 5 points [-]

If I understand correctly, one of the posts in the creepiness is male weakness / conceptual superweapons sequence was linked to recently by Marginal Revolution. The comments weren't kind, and this was the immediate cause of Yvain locking down his blog, even if he had planned to do so for a while.

I wouldn't want any gender discussion linked to under my Real Name either. As much as I'm disappointed that I can't read his posts, I can't say that I would have reacted any differently.

Comment author: iceman 17 December 2013 10:19:39PM 30 points [-]

I put a check for $10,000 in the mail earlier this week. (That said, I don't believe my donation is available for the 3x Thiel matching, as I'm a preexisting large donor. Likewise, my employer will only match $1,000 of it, since they have an annual cap.)

In general, I'm much happier with MIRI/SIAI as an organization now than I've ever been in the past. I'm highly supportive of more public facing research and more engagement with the academic community. The workshops appear to be producing fantastic results, like the probabilistic logic paper, and I'm hoping to see more things like that.

Comment author: iceman 13 December 2013 04:36:01AM *  29 points [-]

Premise: Quirrell plays the game one level higher than Harry Potter.

Observation: This entire incident is uncharacteristically sloppy. Why were the unicorn corpses found? Why was Quirrell discovered?

Observation: Harry Potter is now really pissed off that herds of unicorns to slay aren't standard procedure for stable-izing people with life threatening injuries. He has just been given another "if only" to fixate on. It has been brought to his attention in ways that wouldn't trip his "why am I being told this" sense.

Father had told Draco that to fathom a strange plot, one technique was to look at what ended up happening, assume it was the intended result, and ask who benefited.

Hypothesis: Reminding Harry that there were ways the wizarding world could have saved Hermione was the primary effect. Possible secondary effects may include impressing on Harry just how ridiculously powerful he is. Perhaps implanting the desire to save Quirrell into Harry's mind? Quirrell may not actually need the blood right now, though I suspect it doesn't hurt.

Comment author: iceman 22 November 2013 05:09:39AM 45 points [-]

Survey Taken.

Comment author: iceman 05 November 2013 04:46:47AM 23 points [-]

I'm going to channel gwern from last year: give us a question that allows us to express disaproval about the handeling of the basilisk.

When I was interviewed about Friendship is Optimal, there was a minor side discussion in the comments on the interview. The comments were nonspecific enough that I think it's OK linking there; I'm pointing out that this is not going away since this came up with no prompting on something that only mentioned LessWrong. That interview is from 3 months ago, nearly a year after Yvain rejected having a basilisk question on the 2012 census.

This is still an issue. It will continue to be an issue. The way forward through this issue is to have something linkable that suggests that "XX% of LessWrongers (dis)agreed with the handling of the situation," so that the next time (Xixidu / RW / some internet rando) mentions the situation, we can point out that what the majority of LessWrongers actually think. (The phrasing there obviously suggests what I think, but if the results come back the other way, that too is useful information!)

Comment author: gwern 01 November 2013 10:06:01PM 5 points [-]

American; Explosions in the Sky released a new album/OST:

Besides that, I ran into a chiptune album 'Fake the Bitters' by 8bit Betty and liked it enough to buy. I kept, in album order:

(Each is available on YouTube if you prefer to use their player.)

Japanese:

I finished playing Umineko. The soundtrack is one of the strong points, and I wound up liking quite a few of the tracks; in alphabetical order from the game soundtracks ("Requiem" is from the anime, see the discography torrent):

Doujin:

Touhou (version 17 of the mega-torrent is out, BTW), reverse order:

Comment author: iceman 03 November 2013 07:35:09AM *  3 points [-]

Thank you for introducing me to Explosions in the Sky. I've listened to The Earth Is Not a Cold Dead Place all the way through multiple times today. I'm fairly partial to the final track, Your Hand In Mine.

Comment author: lukeprog 23 July 2013 07:57:50PM 8 points [-]

Thanks very much!

I would also like to affirm that thread's claim that "if what you really want is ponies, the Truly Friendly AI will in fact give you ponies." ("Really want", of course, requires lots of unpacking.)

Comment author: iceman 23 July 2013 11:49:27PM 1 point [-]

Yes, though I find it improbable that they'd Really Want ponies.

(Devil's advocate: there are people who participate in the fandom daily, and have big chunks of their identity tied up in being a brony. If there were actually a population where people would Really Want ponies, this would be the one.)

View more: Prev | Next