Comment author: insaneabd 14 April 2009 08:07:11PM 2 points [-]

An Eliezer Yudkowsky article a day keeps irrationality away.

Comment author: badger 06 April 2009 01:01:04AM *  1 point [-]

I'm fully ready to admit this is not my area of expertise, which is why I thought I'd throw this idea out before putting too much effort into it. I don't think there is a built-in export function, but all the posts are stored as XML in a single file, so it shouldn't be hard to scrape the content if desired.

I also confess ignorance as to how standard the markup language is. Perhaps any contributions should stick to plain text if possible to aid future conversion.

In response to comment by badger on Rationalist Wiki
Comment author: insaneabd 07 April 2009 05:06:59PM 1 point [-]

The markup is more or less standard. Some adjustments will, however, need to be made before porting. The posts can be extracted pretty easily.

However, I would not recommend this, except as a very basic start up, because the single file in which everything is stored grows in size pretty fast.

In response to Where are we?
Comment author: ciphergoth 02 April 2009 09:53:09PM 1 point [-]

Post in this thread if you live outside Europe, the US, or Canada.

In response to comment by ciphergoth on Where are we?
Comment author: insaneabd 03 April 2009 02:52:16PM 2 points [-]

Lahore, Pakistan

Comment author: insaneabd 31 March 2009 03:49:11PM 1 point [-]

As Eliezer's Quantum Physics sequence showed, Rationality can go a long a way in helping scientist get to the better theories faster. Which helps mankind WIN, which helps the individual scientists who worked on the theories WIN etc etc. A very practical benefit of Rationality.

Comment author: insaneabd 01 March 2009 06:38:40PM -1 points [-]

What rationality really is? A concrete definition, and not a "virtue which is nameless"..

Comment author: insaneabd 01 March 2009 06:34:05PM 2 points [-]

the informal use of the bayesian probability method to analyze the plausibility of various statements...

Comment author: PhilGoetz 01 March 2009 06:26:31AM *  4 points [-]

I might not be a rationalist by Eliezer's definition. Eliezer said that there must be a rational solution to Newcomb's paradox. I find that belief irrational. (Although there may be a rational solution to Newcomb's paradox.) Rationalists don't have faith in rationalism.

Comment author: insaneabd 01 March 2009 06:22:51PM 4 points [-]

Or maybe the evidence he has justifies his belief in the possible solution to the paradox, and similarly for you. Its only after you two share your evidence and fail to agree that one of you can be called a non-rationalist (on these grounds).

Comment author: insaneabd 01 March 2009 06:20:04PM 4 points [-]

It was happening slowly while I was growing up. I can remember many small times when I was breaking away from tradition and the beliefs of my parents and family. Things started to speed when I discovered OB and Eliezer... Then I started university.. A very rigorous course in maths emphasizing the axiomatic approach to maths. A very logical course in physics. Then I started reading the quantum physics sequence, something I had not done before. I read No Safe Defense, Not Even Science (http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/05/no-defenses.html) and that was the crucial "Aha!" point that pushed me over the edge. This was only a few months back. And here I am.