Comment author: Elo 13 June 2015 08:47:54AM *  2 points [-]

Sorry, not sure what this means. Actually if you are asking for my numbers on my survey...

  1. make the world better - 6 I am not sure that being here is actually doing that. Nor am I sure how to prove that.
  2. fun - 3 I am not occupying time as other people are, "in between things" and I have not been a forum-contributor very much before LessWrong.
  3. friends - 4 I am beginning to make friends, but thats not as a function of the forum, more a function of me reaching out and chatting to people in PM's. I also run my local meetup (with friends) and see those people visit and post sometimes. So I don't "need" this place for friends. I feel like friends are a thing that happens over time if you stick around long enough. But it was never why I came here
  4. learn rationality - 7 This is why I came here. I played wikipedia game the first time I got here. Had so many tabs. Nothing made sense. It was great! I was first directed in this direction to an overcoming bias article more than 6 or 7 years ago, but as many more active members will know; I have not been "around" that long. I had a drips-and-drabs interaction to things, I have run a meetup in Sydney for 1.5 years so far (with friends). Only recently re-reading "the craft and the community" sequence. Which has prompted me to be more active and "define my own craft" so to speak.
  5. new ideas - 10 As a place for pointing out new ideas; this place should tend to have a magnetic gravity of them. Previously noted (by everyone) was bitcoin, and I was not in a position to notice it at the time. I feel now I am better in a position to notice new ideas, and opportunities should they arise. They don't happen every day, or every week, but even every few months a great idea might come along. I am here for that.
  6. advertise ideas - 0 I am not selling anything of my own. I have not written a book or created a soylent alternative etc. But I asked this in recognition that maybe the top posters were pushing an agenda. (with the exception that I want to encourage people to go to more in-person meetups. I firmly believe that if you put great and brilliant people from various walks of life together; great things happen)
  7. create craft - 10 I am not quite sure how, but I am trying to get my brain into writings (both as a verb and a noun). Slow progress. I feel like I have something to offer, if only I could get it into sentence structure.
  8. other - 10 meetups. in-person meetups. That is something I care about. Definitely.

(I hope this is what you were asking for)

Comment author: jaime2000 14 June 2015 02:58:13AM 3 points [-]
Comment author: ChristianKl 07 June 2015 03:57:42PM 0 points [-]

K2pdfopt is God's gift to Kindle readers.

It seems to have a lot of settings, do you simply use the standard ones?

Comment author: jaime2000 07 June 2015 06:06:32PM *  1 point [-]

Yes, except that I change the "Device" setting to "Kindle Paperwhite" instead of "Kindle 1-5", and I usually convert the first 5 pages or so to make sure I have the borders right before I convert the whole document. The idea of cropping the margins is to set them such that page numbers and chapter headers are cut while retaining the text. You shouldn't need to touch the left and right margins most of the time, only the top and bottom ones. Use binary search.

Comment author: ChristianKl 06 June 2015 12:05:10PM 0 points [-]

I just got a Kindle Paperwhite. I'm still in the process of learning how to interact with the device. In case you have a Kindle, can you give me a few pointers?

1) How do you organize the relationship between the Kindle and Evernote?
2) How easily is a Kindle damaged by falling to the ground? Is it important to use a case to prevent damage?
3) Do you have tips for good PDF conversion. Especially for textbooks?
4) Anything useful to know as a new Kindle user?

Comment author: jaime2000 07 June 2015 03:55:43PM 1 point [-]

How easily is a Kindle damaged by falling to the ground? Is it important to use a case to prevent damage?

I have accidentally dropped Kindle in a case a couple of times; there was no perceptible damage.

Do you have tips for good PDF conversion. Especially for textbooks?

K2pdfopt is God's gift to Kindle readers. Compare a processed version of the latest paper I read with its original version.

Comment author: D_Malik 03 March 2015 12:14:31AM *  5 points [-]

Assuming no faster-than-light travel and no exotic matter, a civilization which survives the Great Filter will always be contained in its future light cone, which is a sphere expanding outward with constant speed c. So the total volume available to the civilization at time t will be V(t) ~ t^3. As it gets larger, the total resources available to it will scale in the same way, R(t) ~ V(t) ~ t^3.

Suppose the civilization has intrinsic growth rate r, so that the civilization's population grows as P(t) ~ r^t.

Since resources grow polynomially and population grows exponentially in t, as t goes to infinity the resources per person R(t) / P(t) ~ t^3 / r^t goes to zero. And since there is presumably a lower limit on the resources required to support one member of the civilization, r must approach 1 as t goes to infinity. This could mean, for instance, that each person has only one child before dying, or that everybody is immortal and never has children.

Of course these conclusions are pretty well-known round here, but I thought the scaling argument was neat and I haven't seen it before.

This seems likely to be a problem even if we get FAI, since certainly some people's CEVs include having children, and even with a starting population of a single person with such values, we'll run up against resource limits, if the premises hold. (I suppose those future people lucky enough to live under FAI will just have to dry their tears with million-utilon bills.)

Another thought: Perhaps we could use relativity to get around this. If we expand outward at the speed of light, subjective time for people close to the edge will be greatly reduced, so each person could grow up, travel to the frontier at near lightspeed, and have their 2 children or whatever. To the rest of us I think this'll look like increasingly many people crammed at the edge of the sphere, through length contraction. (I haven't studied relativity, so this might be wrong.)

Comment author: jaime2000 03 March 2015 12:29:53AM *  5 points [-]

I like Eliezer's solution better. Rather than wait until exponential population growth eats all the resources, we just impose population control at the start and let every couple have a max of two children. That way, population grows at most linearly (assuming immortality).

Comment author: jaime2000 02 March 2015 03:06:29PM *  13 points [-]

365tomorrows recently published a hard science-fiction story of mine called "Procrastination", which was inspired by the ideas of Robin Hanson. I believe LessWrong will find it enjoyable.

Comment author: paper-machine 25 February 2015 09:52:58PM *  3 points [-]

Native speaker here; I think it's acceptable. It gives a connotation along the lines of, "had it not been for the fact that he would die, he would have no other reason for doing X."

Comment author: jaime2000 26 February 2015 12:20:15AM 0 points [-]

Non-native speaker here; I agree with you. I knew what "insofar as" meant, and the statement parsed fine.

Comment author: jaime2000 25 February 2015 08:02:11PM 3 points [-]

"Power of unicorn'ss blood to presserve life makess excellent combination with troll'ss healing. Only Fiendfyre and Killing Cursse sshall girl-child fear, from thiss day."

What, not basilisk venom? In canon, that was also a way to destroy a horcrux.

I am also updating towards the theory that what we are seeing in this chapter and the last is some sort of illusion; either the mirror or hpmor!legilimency. The biggest piece of evidence against it is Eliezer's assurances that the story will not lie to us because he wants the plot to be solvable; he was very careful to point out that Draco's false memory was, in fact, false.

Comment author: jaime2000 24 February 2015 08:59:13PM *  15 points [-]

After reading comments in /r/hpmor, I've realized that Professor Quirrell has a superior move in the previous chapter, which has hopefully updated or will update soon.

Be honest, Eliezer; you just got sick of all the naked Harry jokes.

How I laughed when I realised it! When I saw you had made a Good Voldemort to oppose the evil one - ah, how I laughed!

I guess now we know what Dumbledore was laughing about in chapter 17.

The Cloak of Invisibility was torn away from him, and the shimmering black Cloak flew away from him, through the air.

Professor Quirrell caught it, and swiftly drew it over himself; in less than a second he had pulled down the Cloak's hood over his head, and disappeared.

Quirrell can escape the trap because he is no longer reflected in the mirror, being hidden by the True Cloak of Invisibility. All he has to do is walk out of the reflection, which he did.

Into the hand of the Albus Dumbledore flew from his sleeve his long, dark-grey wand, and in his other hand, as though from nowhere, appeared a short rod of dark stone.

Albus Dumbledore threw these both violently aside, just as the building sense of power rose to an unbearable peak, and then disappeared.

The Mirror returned to showing the ordinary reflection of a gold-lit room of white stone, without any trace of where Albus Dumbledore had been.

After reading Reddit, my interpretation of this scene is that Dumbledore realized Quirrellmort would not be affected by the trap, and that the only result would be that Harry would be trapped eternally outside of Time. Dumbledore makes a split-second decision to sacrifice himself in order to save the boy, throws the Elder Wand and the Line of Merlin Unbroken out of the mirror's reflection so that they will not be trapped with the headmaster, and trades places with Harry just before the Process of the Timeless (the rising sense of power) finishes. Albus Dumbledore is now trapped inside the mirror forever, and Harry Potter is back in the real room with Professor Quirrell.

Comment author: lerjj 23 February 2015 08:44:38PM 0 points [-]

I think we're meant to take this as everyone being outside the mirror. If anyone is inside, it's real!Dumbledore, but he probably has a method of getting out. That's how I read it, anyway:

P.S. how do you quote this? It won't let me copy off of FanFiction.net for some reason.

Comment author: jaime2000 23 February 2015 08:55:09PM 6 points [-]

Look at the html source.

Comment author: Capla 20 February 2015 06:38:48PM 5 points [-]

I want to spend a few weeks seriously looking into cryonics: how it works, the costs, the theory about revival, the changes in the technology in the past 60 years, the options that are available.

I want to become an expert in cryonics to the extent that I can answer, in depth, the questions that people typically have when they hear about this "crazy idea" for the first time. {Hmm...That sounds a little like bottom-line reasoning, trying to prepare for objections, instead of ferreting out the truth. I'll have to be careful of that. To be fair, I will need to overcome objections to get my family to sign up. Still, be careful of looking for data just to affirm my naive presumption.}

What should I read?

Comment author: jaime2000 22 February 2015 05:27:45AM *  0 points [-]

Read Chronospause, Cryonics, and Mike Darwin's comment history. Mike Darwin is very, very based.

If you still want more, try reading all the articles under the "cryonics" tag and gwern's "Plastination versus Cryonics".

View more: Next