Comment author: James_Miller 21 January 2014 05:47:19AM *  13 points [-]

I'd like to hear this from a financial expert. Do we have any who'd like to speak on this?

I'm one (PhD in economics) and yes and ordinary investors should use low fee index funds.

Comment author: jazmt 23 January 2014 01:19:27AM 1 point [-]

For ordinary investors won't there still be an issue of buying these funds at the right time, so as not to buy when the market is unusually high?

Comment author: zedzed 22 January 2014 05:20:46AM *  4 points [-]

It depends on your use case. My "life work" consists exclusively of things I've typed. These types of files tend to be small, and lend themselves to being written in Google Documents. If I use Emacs, then the files are tiny and I back them up to Google Drive in about 2 seconds. This costs me all of $0 and is very easy.

But maybe your life work also includes a bunch of pictures documenting your experiences. These, and other large files, will quickly exceed your 15 gigs of free storage. Then you're probably looking at an external hard drive or cloud storage. The better fit will depend on things like your internet connection, which USB standard your computer has, your tech level, how much stuff you need backed up, whether you travel a lot, whether you'll lose or damage the external hard drive, etc.

And then just use Yvain's method to find the best one.

Of course, there's more elaborate solutions for power users, but by the time you're high enough level for them, you're a power user and don't need to ask.

Comment author: jazmt 23 January 2014 01:11:57AM 0 points [-]

Thank you, I basically use this method now and am glad to have it corroborated by an expert.

Comment author: SaidAchmiz 21 January 2014 05:19:13AM 27 points [-]

making physical backups of data

Oh boy, is this ever a good example.

I used to work retail, selling and repairing Macs and Mac accessories. When I'd sell someone a computer, I'd tell them — no, beg them — to invest in a backup solution. "I'm not trying to sell you anything!", I'd say. "You don't have to buy your backup device from us — though we'd be glad to sell you one for a decent price — but please, get one somewhere! Set it up — heck, we'll set it up for you — and please... back up! When you come to us after your hard drive has inevitably failed — as all hard drives do eventually, sure as death or taxes — with your life's work on it, you'll be glad you backed up."

And they'd smile, and nod, and come back some time later with a failed hard drive, no backup, and full of outrage that we couldn't magic their data back into existence. And they'd pay absurd amounts of money for data recovery.

Back up your data, people. It's so easy (if you've got a Mac, anyway). The pain of losing months or years of work is really, really, really painful.

Comment author: jazmt 22 January 2014 04:12:16AM 0 points [-]

What method of backing up data do you recommend for a computer with windows? How often do you recommend doing it?

Comment author: Emile 21 January 2014 10:28:11PM 0 points [-]

Thanks a lot for writing this! 58 new cards added to my Anki deck! I'll probably read some bits of the book once I have digested them a little (especially chapters 4, 5 and 7).

Silly question, what exactly is meant by "rubric"? Is it just highlighting part of a text in bold (or in color)?

Comment author: jazmt 22 January 2014 03:47:18AM 3 points [-]

A rubric is a tool for assessment. It identifies criterion for evaluating work by identifying the categories of achievement and the measurements of levels of achievement in each category. This seems like a basic summary with examples: http://learnweb.harvard.edu/alps/thinking/docs/rubricar.htm

Comment author: jazmt 20 January 2014 02:56:07AM 27 points [-]

Train your tongue to say "I don't know", lest you be brought to falsehood -Babylonian Talmud

Comment author: jazmt 20 January 2014 02:20:38AM 1 point [-]

Are you familiar with Doug Lemov's "Teach like a champion"? If so how does is compare with "How Learning Works"?

Comment author: TheOtherDave 16 January 2014 09:02:33PM 0 points [-]

For my own part, I didn't find it too difficult to reconceptualize my understanding of what a "choice" was when dealing with the knowledge that I will predictably fail to choose certain options which nevertheless feel like choices I'm free to make.

The experience of choosing to do something is part of the experience of doing certain things, just like the experience of feeling like I could have chosen something different is. These feelings have no particular relationship to the rest of the world, any more than my feeling scared of something necessarily means that thing is frightening in any objective sense.

Comment author: jazmt 19 January 2014 02:07:09AM 1 point [-]

My point is that we can't help but think of ourselves as having free will, whatever the ontological reality of free will actually is.

Comment author: fowlertm 16 January 2014 07:08:13PM 2 points [-]

Another nail hit squarely on the head. Your concept of a strange playing field has helped crystallize an insight I've been grappling with for a while -- a strategy can be locally rational even if it is in some important sense globally irrational. I've had several other insights which are specific instances of this and which I only just realized are part of a more general phenomenon. I believe it can be rational to temporarily suspend judgement in the pursuit of certain kinds of mystical experiences (and have done this with some small success), and I believe that it can be rational to think of yourself as a causally efficacious agent even when you know that humans are embedded in a stream of causality which makes the concept of free will nonsensical.

Comment author: jazmt 16 January 2014 07:28:10PM 1 point [-]

It seems impossible to choose whether to think of ourselves as having free will, unless we have already implicitly assumed that we have free will. More generally the entire pursuit of acting more rational is built on the implicit premise that we have the ability to choose how to act and what to believe.

Comment author: jazmt 16 January 2014 05:16:29AM 1 point [-]

nice post. However it might be better to characterize the first two classes as beliefs which are true because of the belief, instead of as false beliefs (Which is important so as not to unconsciously weaken our attachment to truth). For example in your case of believing that water will help you feel better, the reason you believe it is because it is actually true by virtue of the belief, similarly when the want to be rock star enjoys making music for its own sake the belief that making music is fun is now true.

Comment author: jazmt 23 December 2013 01:14:53AM 4 points [-]

typo: There seems to be an extra 'Y' in column 4 of the first image (it should be CYYY instead of CYYYY)

View more: Prev | Next