Comment author: TobyBartels 01 March 2015 06:40:08AM 1 point [-]

How do we know Sirius is present? Because there is a Death Eater named "Mr Grim" who is stated to have known the Potters.

Is Sirius a Death Eater in this fic? In canon, he was thought to be one, but he never was.

Comment author: jkadlubo 01 March 2015 07:13:19AM 1 point [-]

About Sirius we only have the story from "Skeptical Wizard" (about Weasleys' rat) and some mentions in the Azkaban - nothing to suggest he was good.

Comment author: Romashka 28 February 2015 10:46:31PM 3 points [-]

And then, since he's already figured it out when guessing about the Comed-Tea, Harry will make himself believe that the stars are the people, and so the prophecy means not him, but Voldemort, which is why if he does not stop Voldemort right now, he will fail to fulfill the Vow, which is impossible.

So the Vow will work in his favor, possibly boosting his abilitiesto misdirect in Parseltongue.

Also, Voldemort is aalready the end of the world, and has been since possessing the Pioneer Plague (which can be reached by phoenix at any moment).

Also, Voldemort put on broomstick enchantments on his bones, and Harry already knows a way in which they are fallible: CRAP. NEWTON...

Comment author: jkadlubo 01 March 2015 07:10:48AM 3 points [-]

He didn't put them on his bones; remeber the part, where resurected Voldemort takes some sticks from Quirrell, attatches them to himself and tests flying? Voldemort would likely enchant his own bones later, but right now he has sticks attached to his limbs.

Comment author: Izeinwinter 28 February 2015 08:59:50PM *  3 points [-]

Lets see..

Notes: EY didn't say that noone was aware of what was happening, just that anyone who would help Harry think he is at the game. Given the prophecy about Harry, this has disturbing implications.

Anyway: Obstacles: 39 minions in not-defensively enchanted blacks. One dark lord who can't use magic on you, but who can shoot your ass, An absolute prohibition on moves that could escalate to world threatening levels.

Assets: Naked pasty english lad. Wand. Parseltongue.

.. You know, normally in this sort of situation I'd recommend talking. Parseltongue is far and away the most potent tool he has, because he can tell Voldemort true things, and Voldemort will not be able to scoff at him.

But the problem is, the only things Harry could tell him that would make him delay killing him are things Voldemort should not be told, even at the cost of his life.

So combat it is.

Sigh. This is going to hurt.

Cant partially transfigure air, but wands are not indivisible objects, so he still has a small amount of material to work with, at least once.

Partially transfigure the tip of the wand into photons. The kind of flash of light that leaves burns. Everyone is looking at you - And now they are all blind. Possibly also on fire. Do it with the center of the tip so that you are in the shadow cast by the wand - but expect a hospital stay. And a need for a new wand. Primarily, the point is that this will attract attention. Most likely, timeturned attention. So if you do this, there is now a reason for someone to rescue you a faction of a second after the initial flash. .. Which shouldn't actually even be necessary. If I read Voldemort correctly, he will bail if actually hurt. Certainly since he has already extracted the wow...

Comment author: jkadlubo 28 February 2015 09:05:06PM 1 point [-]

Could he tell Voldemort aout partial transfiguration and request his own life spared?

Comment author: yaeiou 28 February 2015 08:37:35PM 1 point [-]

I was thinking of a transfigured portkey attached to one of his fingernails. That way even if bound he should still be able to activate it.

Comment author: jkadlubo 28 February 2015 09:01:02PM 2 points [-]

BUT The students were issued with portkeys in the form of toe rings and Harry got rid of his explicitly.

Comment author: solipsist 28 February 2015 08:52:22PM 3 points [-]

Another question for Eliezer: can this solution involve some past preparations not explicitly seen on camera? Like, can we say "Harry has a Weasley-provided pink plastic flamingo in his pouch, which he can use to defeat 37 Death Eaters in the obvious fashion."

Comment author: jkadlubo 28 February 2015 08:57:53PM 3 points [-]

I would say no to the Flamingo, but yes to any object ever mentioned in the story (e.g. car engine that he tried to use in the first battle), after all, Harry prepared his pouch for anything and everything that he could fathom.

Comment author: malcolmocean 19 February 2015 08:20:51PM *  2 points [-]

The tinychat version is embedded in the Complice version, so absolutely. The transition has been very smooth, with people just gradually checking out the new page. That is, I suppose, one single advantage of not switching away from tinychat.

The only difference might be that people may be less likely to post the pomo time into the chat, because they have it as part of the complice page. But if you ask, they'll still answer :)

Comment author: jkadlubo 20 February 2015 07:32:06AM 3 points [-]

And people stopped stating the beginning and expected end of a pomodoro on chat. Almost everybody uses Complice's pomodoro timer which just rings the beginning of a pomodoro and this might be slightly confusing for people without the timer when the chat suddenly goes all quiet for no apparent reason.

Comment author: jkadlubo 12 January 2015 05:45:39PM 1 point [-]

John Medina's "Brain Rules". I also recommend/give all future* parents his "Brain Rules for Baby". I have not yet had time to read his other works, but these two make me want to.

*Also to parents of small kids. And to anyone thinking about having children.

Comment author: jkadlubo 25 December 2014 05:25:11PM 8 points [-]

A few years ago I flossed for a whole January, but then became complacent and stopped. It might have been an altogether too hard NYR for me, so this year I have one good idea and a firm intent to keep it:

  • If somebody tells me I should check something with a doctor, I will.

I have a few reasons for this. I was raised to believe that if I visit a doctor more than once a year, I must be a hypochondriac. So I just didn't. Plus, since I almost never see any doctors, I don't really know what is worrisome and what is normal, I just used to ignore anything happening with my body. This is also an excercise in trust. I know I can't really trust myself in the matter of my own health, so I will consciously put trust in other people intead of waving away their good advice.

Comment author: Lumifer 22 December 2014 08:07:58PM 12 points [-]

Let me point out that not having a holiday when everyone around you does, and, in particular, not getting presents when everyone around you does, is not going to make your kids happy.

There is a reason why e.g. Chanukkah stopped being a minor Jewish holiday and became a major Jewish holiday.

Comment author: jkadlubo 23 December 2014 01:37:27PM *  5 points [-]

You could raise your kids entirely in atheism and forget about Christmas altogether.

Let me point out that not having a holiday when everyone around you does (...) is not going to make your kids happy.

Poland is one of very few countries in the world, where you can be sentenced to prison for hurting somebody's religious feelings. Of course, only catholic religious feelings count. It's a country where even atheists baptize their children, because everybody does so. My son is the first child in the history of his school to not attend religion classes (and those are not religion classes, those are catholicism classes, and they are organized by the Church, so the teachers are not really subordinates of the headmasters).

Until we move out of the country, there is no way to avoid Christmas. This is of course my particular situation, but I can easily imagine more people in similar "trouble".

Comment author: gwillen 23 December 2014 10:04:20AM 2 points [-]

I think some people who oppose religion view it that way, but I would be surprised if there was a substantial contingent of people who are themselves atheists, but nevertheless view religion as a valuable tool to control the masses.

I can imagine maybe a small number of high-level US Republican strategists thinking that way. But not any large number of people.

Comment author: jkadlubo 23 December 2014 01:29:41PM 0 points [-]

When I told my first family that we're not going to baptise our son and we'll raise him atheist (and implicated the same for any future children), my father asked: then how will you teach him morals, what is good and bad? Only religion can do that!

View more: Prev | Next