Comment author: kerspoon 02 August 2013 02:25:34PM 0 points [-]

Looking forward to seeing everyone at 2pm this Sunday. Here is a rough plan on what I plan to cover:

  1. Finding goals for yourself.
  2. Making them a better fit of what you actually want to do (rather than things that sound good).
  3. Turning those goals into tasks you are actually likely to do.
Comment author: skeptical_lurker 09 June 2013 06:02:42AM 0 points [-]

I happen to be in London this afternoon, I know it is late notice but I assume it is ok for newbies to turn up? Also, is there some specific way to recognize you?

Comment author: kerspoon 09 June 2013 11:09:45AM 0 points [-]

Hi, I realise you have crossed out your post but I will answer it anyway,

We are very happy for new people to turn up. It's the first meetup of the new format but that shouldn't matter (it will be a little new for all of us).

We are fairly easy to recognise but we also have the art lebedev paperclip on our tables http://www.artlebedev.com/everything/skrepkus/

Comment author: kerspoon 31 May 2013 08:48:55PM 0 points [-]

Great stuff, see you there.

Comment author: kerspoon 28 May 2013 11:36:16AM 1 point [-]

I'd definitely go, unless it was on the weekend of the 9th Aug.

I would probably be happy to let some people stay at my house if they were traveling from outside of London. I would have to agree this part with my housemate.

It might also be worth adding to this thread on the LessWrongLondon group https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/lesswronglondon/sLdnshaeHHg (I would certainly appreciate it as I don't check LessWrrong.com very often)

Comment author: kerspoon 11 May 2013 06:57:15PM 1 point [-]

Thanks everyone for coming. It was an intense discussion with quite a few points for me to mull on (and more important a few things I will do). I hope everyone had fun.

It looks like there will be another meetup at 2pm tomorrow (Sunday 12th) in the same place (Shakespeare's Head Holborn). I hope to see you all there.

Some of the points discussed (I'm not saying I agree, simply pointing them out):

  • If you can program computers then get part-time freelance 'rent-a-coder' work online. This is good because it will give you a strong safety net to take risks (e.g. quit work to try doing ..., be able to follow through on leaving if you don't get a raise, whatever). It is also good as you can earn while travelling the world (which you should do). I have also realised that it helps make trade-off decisions easier (e.g. I should hire a cleaner IFF the amount I pay them is less than I can earn doing freelance work in that time).

  • Drugs are good (unless you are an idiot or addict). Psilocybin mushrooms and weed were mentions to expand or change thoughts. Dexadrin and similar were mentioned to work well for learning (not sure if that is keeping focused, memory retention, or other).

  • Quick happiness hack: send thank you letters to people who you should thank.

  • All our special guests talked about about creating a movement, bringing together smart, dedicated people.

  • http://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/ The Future of Humanity Institute (University of Oxford) is worth visiting and chatting to the people there.

  • There was a discussion (Rikk and others) about having another sort of meetup where we do stuff rather than talk. Or even plan stuff that we then go and do rather than talk. I am strongly in favour of this.

I'm sure there was more that I didn't manage to hear.

Thanks Cat, Michael and Jaan.

Comment author: Tenoke 05 May 2013 09:24:17PM 3 points [-]

Perhaps add London to the title so people can see that there is a London meetup by glancing and not only after they've visited the thread?

Comment author: kerspoon 05 May 2013 10:08:03PM 3 points [-]

Thanks, I assumed that was done automatically. I have fixed it (hopefully).

Comment author: kerspoon 14 December 2012 03:43:04PM 1 point [-]

I'm planning on coming too. It will be my first less wrong meetup, anything I need to know beforehand?

Comment author: DanArmak 20 September 2012 06:19:33PM 3 points [-]

I wish I could see a doctor-statistician. Or at least a doctor who understood statistics.

Comment author: kerspoon 25 September 2012 12:29:23PM 0 points [-]
Comment author: David_Gerard 22 February 2012 01:17:55PM -1 points [-]

Hmm ... quality, really. One of the functions of Discussion is posts that aren't ready for main. That's what I meant, that this post is good enough for that.

Do you have enough karma now to move it to main? If so you should. Or maybe a moderator can.

Comment author: kerspoon 22 February 2012 10:15:12PM 0 points [-]

I do not know how to move it. If you think it should can you please ask a moderator.

Comment author: torekp 22 February 2012 02:54:34AM 0 points [-]

For the most part, my response to recommendation 1 is: this won't be much use. It is hard enough remembering "the bottom line" without also remembering the source or evidence. Most fact-learning occasions call instead for a snap judgment on the quality of the source or evidence, followed by accepting or rejecting or setting some quasi-probabilistic attitude toward the information, and then spending no more mental energy on the evidence. In those cases, the evidence is usually soon forgotten. So, most fact-recalling occasions are not going to reveal my reason for the alleged fact.

Obviously there are exceptions. If the information is controversial and I intend to share it, then I'll try remembering the source. Or better, bookmarking a link or taking notes.

Comment author: kerspoon 22 February 2012 10:11:34AM 0 points [-]

Please see my response to Viliam and ShardPhoenix.

View more: Prev | Next