If some specific projects (...Rationality Curriculum) become a success, rationality will be much more widespread and, as a result, much less defined.

And 50 years is a bit too much for any notable concentrations of probability.

The most apparent way to talk about such topics here is to completely overhaul the terminology and canonical examples.

And then do something with the resulting referential void.

Certainly not a task for group of less than four people, and likely not a task for group of less than 40.

Is your attempt to single-handedly contribute, with all the costs it imposes, likely enough to give a significant positive result?

Related.