Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

[Link] "Field Patterns" as a new mathmatical construct.

0 morganism 24 February 2017 11:56PM

[Link] On the statistical properties and tail risk of violent conflicts

1 morganism 23 February 2017 03:46AM

[Link] DARPA Perspective on AI

1 morganism 23 February 2017 03:27AM

[Link] Gas hydrate breakdown unlikely to cause clathrate gun - report

1 morganism 19 February 2017 10:47PM

[Link] Mobile users learning faster, in smaller bytes

2 morganism 14 February 2017 09:03PM

[Link] Basic Income. org

0 morganism 11 February 2017 12:01AM

[Link] UNU swarm intel picks SB exact score

0 morganism 06 February 2017 11:38PM

Civil resistance and the 3.5% rule

8 morganism 02 February 2017 06:53PM

Interesting, haven't seen anything data-driven like this before...

 

Civil resistance and the 3.5% rule.

https://rationalinsurgent.com/2013/11/04/my-talk-at-tedxboulder-civil-resistance-and-the-3-5-rule/

"no campaigns failed once they’d achieved the active and sustained participation of just 3.5% of the population—and lots of them succeeded with far less than that."

"Then I analyzed the data, and the results blew me away. From 1900 to 2006, nonviolent campaigns worldwide were twice as likely to succeed outright as violent insurgencies. And there’s more. This trend has been increasing over time—in the last fifty years civil resistance has become increasingly frequent and effective, whereas violent insurgencies have become increasingly rare and unsuccessful."

 

Data viz:

http://www.navcodata.org/

 

 

Interesting strategic viewpoint

http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2016/11/15/how-can-we-know-when-popular-movements-are-winning-look-to-these-four-trends/

1. Size and diversity of participation.

2. Nonviolent discipline.

3. Flexible & innovative techniques. switching between concentrated methods like demonstrations and dispersed methods like strikes and stay-aways.

4. Loyalty shifts.
if erstwhile elite supporters begin to abandon the opponent, remain silent when they would typically defend him, and refuse to follow orders to repress dissidents, or drag their feet in carrying out day-to-day orders, the incumbent is losing his grip.

 

(observations from article above)

"The average nonviolent campaign takes about 3 years to run its course (that’s more than three times shorter than the average violent campaign, by the way)."

"The average nonviolent campaign is about eleven times larger as a proportion of the overall population as the average violent campaign.

"Nonviolent resistance campaigns are ten times more likely to usher in democratic institutions than violent ones."

 

 

 

original overview and links article:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/01/worried-american-democracy-study-activist-techniques

 

and a training site that has some exercises in group cohesion and communication tech, from Guardian.

https://www.trainingforchange.org/tools

 

edit: The article that got me looking, how to strike in a gig economy, and international reach

 

http://www.transnational-strike.info/2017/02/01/how-do-we-strike-when-our-boss-is-a-machine-a-software-or-a-chain-struggles-in-the-gig-economy/

[Link] "What Happens When Doctors Only Take Cash"? Everybody, Especially Patients, Wins

4 morganism 30 January 2017 11:57PM

[Link] A century of research following gifted kids.

3 morganism 30 January 2017 11:44PM

View more: Next