Comment author: moshez 05 April 2011 06:22:23PM 0 points [-]

That doesn't fix the "flow" issue. When I'm writing, the last thing I want to do is to be flipping through my files, looking for the bit file, etc. etc...

Comment author: pertinaciousfox 16 March 2015 12:15:42PM 0 points [-]

Couldn't you just default to "he" when writing, then when finished, flip a coin (or refer to whatever randomized gender generator you prefer), and go back and change the gender if need be? It wouldn't interrupt the work flow; it would just be a little work after to revise.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 16 April 2011 03:40:47AM 4 points [-]

I'm not a statistically significant study, but given "The agent's husband stood up from the table," I would expect pretty much everyone to assume without much effort that the agent was female, but given "The agent led his husband onto the dance floor," I'd expect most people to become confused, and some to assume a gay male agent, and very few to assume a female agent.

That suggests that the "his" gets treated as evidence of the referent's masculinity strong enough to override a strong prior in the other direction.

Comment author: pertinaciousfox 16 March 2015 12:11:01PM 0 points [-]

My predisposition to assume that an agent is male is stronger than my predisposition to assume heteronormative relationships. My immediate reaction to the sentence, "The agent's husband stood up from the table" was to suppose a male agent with a male spouse. But I'm probably unusual in this regard.