Comment author: [deleted] 02 January 2015 05:37:20PM *  0 points [-]

No, that assumes there is such a thing as "your identity" beyond what yourself and others ascribe to you. There's really only just your causal history.

Besides, psychological experiments show that when talking about others rather than themselves, people tend to identify "personal identity" and "moral character or alignment". So that answers that.

In response to comment by [deleted] on Understanding Who You Really Are
Comment author: peter_hurford 03 January 2015 02:17:54AM 2 points [-]

Reduce further -- "what part of the character traits that you and others see yourself as possessing do you value?"

Comment author: peter_hurford 02 January 2015 03:59:32PM 10 points [-]

The question "what part of your identity is of value to you?" sounds like it can rescue the original philosophical meaning of the question, I think.

Comment author: [deleted] 26 December 2014 09:52:13PM 0 points [-]

Interesting thing about the 30 is it also has a small healthy meal attached. Eben says it has to do with maintaining blood sugar - could possibly be that without the meal, you're simply depleting your willpower/blood glucose, Which is why you can't do more than two in a row

In response to comment by [deleted] on Pomodoro for Programmers
Comment author: peter_hurford 27 December 2014 05:31:25AM 0 points [-]

That's a good point. I often eat while working or during my fifteen minute break, and I agree that feels very important for keeping my energy up. I don't know if I ought to dedicate time to eating and only eating, or if I should not eat for the two hour work block, though.

Comment author: VAuroch 26 December 2014 10:52:33PM 0 points [-]

From your description, your break looks more like a change in type of work, for the most part. The useful tasks you outline probably couldn't actually fill up 15 minutes, but just from reading the description it looks dominated by things I also wouldn't consider to be 'resting'.

Comment author: peter_hurford 27 December 2014 05:29:39AM 1 point [-]

From your description, your break looks more like a change in type of work, for the most part.

That's fair. Maybe "work - plan" is a better description than "work - rest"? I personally find the different kind of work still restful, in that I'm getting food, moving around, thinking about different things, not focusing super-hard, but I guess other people might differ on that. Interesting to know.

Comment author: [deleted] 26 December 2014 12:47:33AM 2 points [-]

Eben Pagan has his 60-60-30 technique based around circadian rhythms, may be worth looking into for you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XbRYPriDSw

In response to comment by [deleted] on Pomodoro for Programmers
Comment author: peter_hurford 26 December 2014 06:36:25AM 0 points [-]

Huh, 60-60-30, which is really 50(work)-10(break)-50(work)-30(break). Not too different from my proposal, except for the thirty minute break. I wonder how crucial that part is. Interestingly, I've never managed to do more than two of these 45-15 in a row, so maybe that's something.

Thanks.

Comment author: Andy_McKenzie 25 December 2014 02:32:56PM 6 points [-]

I was thinking of social support of other people's goals.

Comment author: peter_hurford 25 December 2014 05:09:38PM 2 points [-]

Strictly speaking, is there any advantage for people who want to improve themselves to coordinate their efforts to start on the same day?

Not really, but there's an advantage to having one particular day on which to do things, to avoid the "I'll do it someday" problem.

Comment author: Andy_McKenzie 25 December 2014 12:02:23AM 0 points [-]

How much? :)

Comment author: peter_hurford 25 December 2014 12:48:19AM 0 points [-]

It depends. No hard and fast limit yet. I usually have to walk at least to get more food, refill my water bottle, go to the bathroom, etc. Sometimes I walk around more. If I'm tired, I like to take a 5-10min walk outside.

Comment author: Andy_McKenzie 24 December 2014 10:23:01PM 1 point [-]

Do you walk around for at least a little bit of this 15 minute period?

Comment author: peter_hurford 24 December 2014 11:41:40PM 1 point [-]

Yes.

Comment author: bingobongo 24 December 2014 08:45:31PM 1 point [-]

In my opinion you are not resting at all, if that's your routine.

Comment author: peter_hurford 24 December 2014 09:48:54PM 2 points [-]

Different things work for different people. If you need more rest, then modify the routine accordingly. Or maybe this routine simply isn't for you. Consider that it may be for others.

Also, it's not like one would do this 24/7. Longer rests -- "real rests" -- can take place.

You also may underestimate how long fifteen minutes is.

In response to How to Read
Comment author: garabik 23 December 2014 12:22:49PM 4 points [-]

I've made a decision to read fiction primarily in foreign languages, to get some side benefit from it (in addition to the entertainment). This did slow my reading down (I am quite a fast reader) - several times unless I am already proficient in the language. This is mostly because of my conscious effort to pay attention to the grammar and vocabulary (dictionary lookup not included) - otherwise the slowing down would not be so pronounced.

I found out that after 5 or 10 books (and introductory lessons), reading in a foreign language stops being a hard work and becomes enjoyable again.

In response to comment by garabik on How to Read
Comment author: peter_hurford 23 December 2014 04:41:50PM 0 points [-]

That's an awesome idea! I'll do that if I ever learn a foreign language well enough...

View more: Prev | Next