I feel very meh about “wake up the world”, firstly because AI capabilities companies are going to do it for us, and secondly because whether it’s good or bad depends a lot on the quality of what we funnel the world towards
These two points seem contradictory. AI capabilities companies aren't going to do the good thing for us. (Or maybe you think they are? But I'm a bit surprised if you think that.)
Things like how shadows cast on oil barrows (I think)
Yep. If you have a sattelite picture of an oil tank with a floating lid, you can compare the shadow cast on the ground against the shadow cast on the lid to see how full it is.
When the charity sells the stock, what cost basis do they use? Market price on the day they received it?
I've donated £5000 again.
Thanks! It mostly did better at object recognition than me. I imagine I'd have improved with the full res unscuffed images, but I still don't think I'd have recognized the fridge so quickly (though admittedly it wasn't helpful). The only place I thought I'd have done better was when it got confused by the door in the mirror.
I'm interested.
Hm, I think I'd bet against this:
Overall agreed, but I note that the video (which I enjoyed) is a significantly different challenge - when the dad starts sliding the bread around the table with his knife, he doesn't give the kid a chance to say "ah, I see the problem! You need to dip the knife in the peanut butter..."
The EU executive, on the other hand, where most of the real power lies, is apolitical, and the individual commissioners are appointed by member states, not by political parties.
What does apolitical mean in this context?
Claude is what I had installed as an app on my phone. I don't remember any particular reason I installed that app and not the others. I hadn't heard at the time that Claude had the weakest vision, but even if I had I'd probably have used it anyway for convenience.
I'd be vaguely interested to see how other models perform, but not interested enough to put in the effort.