= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
The one-world interpretation does not fail at this point. It seems to me that many-worlds adepts are so hypnotised by the beauty of mathematics that they forget what reality we have to account for...
Rather it is consciousness that confuses people.
Precisely, the conscious experience is everything we have to account for at the end.
In response to
The Dilemma: Science or Bayes?
Actually the many-world interpretation misses something very important, which is a kind of theory of mind.
Why does my consciousness follow only one world and at what point do different worlds separate ? Why am I not conscious of the many-worlds but only of one world ?
The one-world interpretation does not fail at this point. It seems to me that many-worlds adepts are so hypnotised by the beauty of mathematics that they forget what reality we have to account for...
View more: Prev
= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d){kind=logo}
It doesn't. It splits when the worlds split.
Because there's no communication between consciouses in different worlds, even if both of the consciouses are derived from the same T-x individual.
My consciousness does not split, it follows only one world. That is my experience and what I have to account for.