Comment author: michaelcurzi 28 September 2011 05:09:58AM *  4 points [-]

I interned at Quixey this summer (though not as an engineer) and found some of the most skilled rationalists I'd ever met there. It was an excellent experience and comes highly recommended.

Comment author: realitygrill 28 September 2011 04:41:57PM 0 points [-]

They wouldn't be open to this currently, would they?

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 26 August 2011 11:36:06AM *  27 points [-]

Hello!

I'm a 32 year old physics PhD, working (so far) on the oh-so-fashionable subfield of graphene and carbon nanotubes. I took Quantum field theory, which is a little unusual for an experimentalist (though not positively rare). I have a background in programming, and a moderate degree of interest in AI.

I came here by way of the Methods of Rationality. After reading that, and upon seeing that there was a sequence on quantum mechanics, I had a suspicion that it wouldn't be terrible. This suspicion was vastly exceeded. I never encountered the slightest technical flaw, which is better than many physicists can produce on the subject, let alone philosophers and amateur physicists.

I began wandering and seeing what else there was, and it is good. The atmosphere also seems quite good around here, so I thought I'd join the community rather than treating it as a collection of essays and comments.

So here I am.

~~~~ Edited to add: ~~~

I am not sure how this got so many upvotes. Was it the praise? The brevity? That I'm a physicist? The score just stands out on the page a bit, and I'm not at all sure why.

Comment author: realitygrill 30 August 2011 08:41:03PM 5 points [-]

upvoted, because I've been wondering how the QM sequence is looked upon by physicists :)

Comment author: realitygrill 19 August 2011 10:09:25PM 0 points [-]

So, your earlier posts were basically lemmas? Certainly I appreciate all the reference notes.

Comment author: realitygrill 19 August 2011 06:46:10PM 6 points [-]

"The biggest problem we have as human beings is that we confuse our beliefs with reality."

-- Alan Kay, Programming and Scaling

Comment author: Rain 14 May 2011 11:02:06PM *  39 points [-]

For every non-duplicate comment replying to this one praising me for my right action, I will donate $10 to SIAI, up to a cap of $1010, with the count ending on 1 June 2011. Also accepting private messages.

Edit: The cap was met on 30 May. Donation of $1010 made.

Comment author: realitygrill 15 May 2011 08:38:06PM 2 points [-]

Oh Rain, I praise thou so that your status may soar (temporarily) for your right action!

Comment author: mutterc 02 April 2011 11:50:59PM 2 points [-]

Do you have other symptoms of ADD? Scattered memory goes hand in hand with it (along with scattered everything else).

My memory has gotten better since I started treatment.

Quick and dirty test: do stimulants calm you down? If so, you might be an ADDer.

Comment author: realitygrill 03 April 2011 06:23:30PM 0 points [-]

I had ADD diagnosed before, then retracted. Currently I am working on convergence insufficiency, which is significantly co-morbid with ADD.

Comment author: realitygrill 03 April 2011 06:16:56PM 1 point [-]

I would just like to chime in that you're not alone. My memory problems are horrendous, and I've had too much akrasia trouble to consistently do things like Mnemosyne or dual n-back.

As for memory techniques, I dislike mnemonics and my brain does not seem to be the type that can visualize things easily.

Comment author: [deleted] 02 April 2011 03:10:16PM 5 points [-]

I hypothesize that a lot of the problems here are less "forgetting" than "not remembering"-- you find yourself needing information that was never committed to long-term storage in the first place, perhaps because it was not tagged as important the first time you were exposed to it.

This is based on my own experience of being "bad with names": I fixed the problem simply by training myself to think that people's names are important to me, and to pay more attention when I hear a new one (mentally repeating it to myself, and then using it in conversation as soon as possible). I am now not particularly great with names, but good enough not to be embarrassing, and sometimes even to impress people.

So maybe you would get good results by working on your attention as well as your memory? For me, this is part of the purpose of the writing-things-down habit; I only occasionally refer to my notes because I remember things so much better once I've made the effort to write them down, or even just identified them as something I should write down.

In response to comment by [deleted] on I want a better memory.
Comment author: realitygrill 03 April 2011 06:12:38PM 0 points [-]

Yes, it's been shown that you remember facts better if you think it will be tested later on.

Comment author: realitygrill 03 April 2011 01:34:51AM 0 points [-]

I also resubmitted, having realized I signed up a year ago. Please use my new app!

Comment author: MBlume 24 February 2011 01:47:20AM 10 points [-]

Someone should really write a prediction market using bitcoins -- it would be simpler for US-based users to participate.

Comment author: realitygrill 25 February 2011 05:38:50PM 1 point [-]

I'd like to create one of these for evaluating the usefulness of information products (which by and large, suck).

View more: Prev | Next