In response to Linkposts now live!
Comment author: VipulNaik 28 September 2016 10:56:22PM *  4 points [-]

I'm unable to edit past posts of mine; it seems that this broke very recently and I'm wondering if it's related to the changes you made.

Specifically, when I click the Submit or the "Save and Continue" buttons after making an edit, it goes to lesswrong.com/submit with a blank screen. When I look at the HTTP error code it says it's a 404.

I also checked the post after that to see if the edit still went through, and it didn't. In other words, my edit did not get saved.

Do you know what's going on? There were a few corrections/expansions on past posts that I need to push live soon.

Comment author: riceissa 28 September 2016 11:03:50PM 2 points [-]

I confirm that I also experience this problem, but I don't have additional insight on the cause.

Comment author: Evan_Gaensbauer 09 January 2015 10:09:12AM 0 points [-]

I wish to write a one-year retrospective and/or report on this post. I'll contact Ben Kuhn to run this idea by him, to see if he would be interested. If he's too busy, as I expect he might be, I at least hope to seek his blessing to extend the mission of critiquing effective altruism.

There are also other critiques, like this one. Additionally, there have been counters and defenses in response to this post in the previous year. Further, specific to effective altruism, e.g., on the effective altruism forum, there has been more discussion of these ideas. I will take into account points from relevant and well-argued responses to this article in my retrospective report, and assessment of progress, vis a vis specific criticisms.

I don't believe I'm necessarily the best person to write this. However, I want to see it done, and nobody else has tried. However, I'm eager to collaborate with others. I'll write a rough draft, and outline, for this retrospective assessment. Comment below, or privately message me, if you'd be interested in reading. I will give you access to the Google Doc. This comment is the first action taken toward writing this assessment, so I expect it will take me at least a week to generate a first draft.

Comment author: riceissa 25 July 2016 07:38:39PM 0 points [-]

Hi Evan, did you ever write this post?

Comment author: Elo 26 July 2014 10:32:39AM 0 points [-]

start a facebook group to generate interest. it seems to be the way to go. maybe you can attract people travelling through Tokyo.

Comment author: riceissa 02 December 2014 12:47:16AM 0 points [-]

Okay I've created a Facebook group here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/LessWrongTokyo/

(To be sure, I don't currently live in Tokyo, but I visit there every summer and would be very interested in attending during that time.)

Comment author: riceissa 28 October 2014 07:52:57AM 30 points [-]

I took the survey.

Comment author: [deleted] 23 September 2014 03:08:11AM 4 points [-]

Does muflax still have a blog or write somewhere? I remember reading some interesting things, but I can't find them now. My memory may be faulty.

In response to comment by [deleted] on Open thread, September 22-28, 2014
Comment author: riceissa 28 September 2014 08:51:23AM 1 point [-]

Gwern still links to some of muflax's writings, using his own backups. Googling something like "site:gwern.net muflax" turns up some results (though not many).

Comment author: Metus 15 September 2014 11:05:59PM 3 points [-]

How do I build the habit of writing down a fleeting thought that seems interesting? Way too often I notice that I just wanted to do something or write something down. Or should I just accept the thought as gone?

Comment author: riceissa 22 September 2014 09:21:34AM 2 points [-]

I usually ask these as questions on Quora. Quora is incredibly tolerant of even inane questions, and has the benefit of allowing others to provide feedback (in the form of answers and comments to the question). If a question has already been asked, then you will also be able to read what others have written in response and/or follow that question for future answers. Quora also has the option of anonymizing questions. I've found that always converting my thoughts into questions has made me very conscious of what sort of questions are interesting to ask (not that there's anything right with that).

Another idea is to practice this with writing down dreams. After waking up, I often think "It's not really worth writing that dream down anyway", whereas in reality I would find it quite interesting if I came back to it later. Forcing oneself to write thoughts down even when one is not inclined to may lead to more sedulous record-keeping. (But this is just speculation.)

Comment author: Emile 07 May 2013 05:23:00PM *  20 points [-]

Keyword searches are extremely useful.

I make excessive use of these, I can just type "i birch" in the address bar and get a google image search for "birch"

My keywoard searches include:

  • 'i' for Google Images
  • 'yt' for YouTube
  • 'wp' for Wikipedia
  • 'fr' for French Wikipedia
  • 'lw' for LessWrong
  • 'sc' for Google Scholar
  • 'so' for Stack Overflow
  • ... and occasionally others when I find that I'm searching a website very often

How do you create keyword searches?

In Firefox, it's explained here : http://robertnyman.com/2006/09/13/smart-keywords-in-firefox-are-outstanding/

In Chrome, it's explained here: http://lifehacker.com/5476033/how-to-set-keyword-bookmarks-in-google-chrome

In both cases, it boils down do associating a keyword with a search url of the form "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%s&title=Special%3ASearch", such that when you type "keyword whatever" in your search bar, %s in your search url is replaced by 'whatever'.

Combine this with the fact that adding "site:somewhere.com" in a google query restricts the search to that domain, you can make custom searches for any website (though in some cases, like wikipedia and stack overflow, the site's search function is more useful - for example, that wikipedia query up there will bring you directly to the page if it exists).

Comment author: riceissa 11 September 2014 03:05:37AM 1 point [-]

It's worth noting that there is also DuckDuckGo (a search engine), which has bang expressions for outsourcing results. Just to give some of the equivalents for those listed above: "!gi" for Google Images, "!yt" for YouTube, "!w" for Wikipedia, etc. To be sure, one has to rely on DuckDuckGo for adding the expressions (although I've had success suggesting a new expression before).

Comment author: xrchz 10 July 2012 07:53:26AM 1 point [-]

I know someone who might be interested in doing some translations into Japanese. If you add that language we might have a go.

Comment author: riceissa 10 July 2012 11:26:58PM 1 point [-]

I am also interested in doing Japanese translations.