Comment author: singularitard 21 October 2014 06:57:37PM *  1 point [-]

This sounds familiar. Are you aware of other similar concepts previously communicated elsewhere? I feel certain I've read something along these lines before. By all means, claim it's original though.

Comment author: sbenthall 21 October 2014 12:10:24AM 1 point [-]

Do you think that rationalism is becoming a religion, or should become one?

Comment author: singularitard 21 October 2014 06:52:25PM *  4 points [-]

Rationalism is a toolset with which to approach problems, not a belief system. If you had a functioning brain, you would know that.

Comment author: singularitard 21 October 2014 06:49:34PM *  2 points [-]

This Thanksgiving I am thankful for the 10 minutes and multitude of brain cells I lost due to this post.

Comment author: DanielLC 18 October 2014 01:08:50AM 0 points [-]

I was trying to guess what you meant. Can you just tell me? What was I assuming, and in what way was it false?

Comment author: singularitard 21 October 2014 06:48:14PM 1 point [-]

Based on the phrase "change which charities I donate to" I had assumed he or she was already donating to multiple charities, presumably including action in subsaharan africa.

Also can you explain the "magnitude" thing? I'm not sure I follow your definition of "effectiveness".

Comment author: ChristianKl 15 October 2014 01:20:25PM 1 point [-]

While Givewell does recommend one charity that focuses on direct cash transfer not every charity recommended by Givewell does and Givewell analyses Charities in detail, so even if you don't agree with their conclusion reading their analysis of a particular charity can help you evaluate the charity.

Comment author: singularitard 21 October 2014 06:45:14PM 0 points [-]

They don't publish very long write-ups, it's more like a checklist of their particular criteria.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 15 October 2014 02:25:06AM 6 points [-]

It's really hard to measure lasting improvements, which does bias the choice of interventions Givewell considers, but they endorse direct transfers because it has been shown to be more effective at lasting improvements than other things they've considered.

Comment author: singularitard 21 October 2014 06:44:26PM *  0 points [-]

You might be (probably are not) right, but it is definitely something that requires research instead of just taking their word for it.

Comment author: slutbunwaller 14 October 2014 05:38:37PM *  1 point [-]

I posted this last week but was too late to get any responses, so I'm reposting:

I want to change which charities I donate to, and am looking for transparent, accountable, secular (or at least non-evangelical) Canadian charities that promote democracy, social reform, infrastructure building, rationality, humanism, education, scientific progress, similar principles. Any suggestions for charities worth investigating, or at least a group/organization/website that can help me find what I'm looking for? In the past I haven't properly researched this sort of thing so I'm short on resources.

So far I've taken a closer look at Oxfam and Doctors Without Borders

(I might remind one of you that disagreement isn't grounds for downvoting all my posts)

Comment author: singularitard 21 October 2014 06:43:30PM 2 points [-]

Amnesty, UNICEF, Bill and Linda Gates Foundation, as far as mainstream charities go. I believe they all have specific Canadian divisions if you are worried about tax reasons.

Some others you might check out are Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Canada Without Poverty, Equiterre, Canadian Council For International Cooperation, Tides Canada, CoDevelopment. I had a longer list but misplaced it.

I also strongly suggest you research each charity on your own instead of depending on whether or not a ranking website tells you it is good.

View more: Prev