Comment author: Mestroyer 14 February 2014 01:03:17AM 7 points [-]

It's got a few things going for it.

It sounds really profound, It's by a person well-respected for his contributions to science It seems to give usable advice for improving your rationality.

Only one problem: it's bullshit. Standard counterexample: quantum mechanics. But even in Galileo's time, or earlier, a rationalist shouldn't have believed this. There's a huge sampling bias. You don't tend to discover things you can't understand.

Comment author: snafoo 18 February 2014 08:49:06PM 5 points [-]

Quantum mechanics is infinitely easier to understand than to discover.

Comment author: Alejandro1 03 February 2014 03:21:43AM 26 points [-]

A serious prophet upon predicting a flood should be the first man to climb a tree.

--Stephen Crane, The Red Badge of Courage.

Comment author: snafoo 18 February 2014 08:44:25PM 4 points [-]

Charlatans also tend to do this.

Often, a charlatan would dedicate her life to selling boats. When questioned if she really believes in the floods, obviously she does! Why else would she be wasting her life as a boatwright?

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 31 December 2013 09:34:20PM 1 point [-]

Looking at the sticker price isn't comparing apples to apples. Aid has gone up drastically. It's never been cheaper for a kid from a poor family to get an education. Although a lot of the increases at state schools relate to decreasing funding, a huge amount of them at private schools (and a lesser extent at state schools) is their financial aid programs. Tuition has become more progressive and we're comparing the top prices.

But if you're middle class the price has gone up and may be unaffordable.

Running a college is about as labor-intensive as it ever has been, which is to say, very. Prices in all labor-intensive stuff have gone up faster than CPI.

And the ratio of administrators to professors has also exploded.

Comment author: snafoo 28 January 2014 06:49:26AM *  -1 points [-]

But if you're middle class the price has gone up and may be unaffordable.

My basic point was just the fact that the numbers we compare have nothing to do with each other. (The really don't.)

And the ratio of administrators to professors has also exploded.

The number of administrators, as traditionally defined, has changed little, though the number of professional staff has increased a lot. The biggest increase has been the growth of IT, though it goes beyond that. The part of this which is IT-related is somewhat mirrored by most other labor-intensive stuff.

Comment author: mwengler 23 December 2013 11:44:24PM 3 points [-]

The typical size comic books were $0.12 when I started buying them. I have no idea what they cost now.

It's also pretty obvious that gasoline has gone up in price for reasons that are not just general increase in prices.

And yet despite its uniqueness, it doesn't really deviate from the trend that everything else follows. Go figure.

I could have thrown in college tuition, about $2870 in 1974 when I started at Swarthmore College, currently $44,368. You still get a professor standing in front of the room for the same number of hours per semester.

Comment author: snafoo 30 December 2013 07:02:45PM 1 point [-]

College tuition inflation is often talked about but rarely dealt with sensibly. To understand the nature and extent of college tuition inflation, it's important to understand

  1. Looking at the sticker price isn't comparing apples to apples. Aid has gone up drastically. It's never been cheaper for a kid from a poor family to get an education. Although a lot of the increases at state schools relate to decreasing funding, a huge amount of them at private schools (and a lesser extent at state schools) is their financial aid programs. Tuition has become more progressive and we're comparing the top prices.

  2. Running a college is about as labor-intensive as it ever has been, which is to say, very. Prices in all labor-intensive stuff have gone up faster than CPI.

There has been a real increase, but it's not all real and it's not all for the reasons a lot of people assume.

Comment author: Jiro 02 December 2013 01:27:30AM 14 points [-]

I'm good at blowing bubbles with bubble gum. I have yet to charge anyone for doing it.

I suppose you could say that as long as I gain pleasure from blowing bubbles I'm not doing it "for free" but that makes the statement very trivial. Under normal interpretations of "for free", the statement is wrong because there's no demand from anyone else that I blow bubbles.

I'd correct that statement to "if you're good at something, never do it under market value", which raises the possibility that I would still do for free things like blowing bubbles that have no market value.

Comment author: snafoo 18 December 2013 07:35:39PM 2 points [-]

The quote is a good one, and not because it's true.

Comment author: MC_Escherichia 04 November 2013 11:18:42PM 0 points [-]

The enemy of the enemy of my enemy is my enemy.

Harrap's First Law

Comment author: snafoo 05 November 2013 10:03:11PM 7 points [-]

"The enemy of my enemy has their own relationship with me."

Comment author: roland 05 November 2013 08:22:03PM 17 points [-]

Efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness is doing the right things.

-- Peter Drucker

Comment author: snafoo 05 November 2013 10:02:17PM 1 point [-]

See also: the distinction between verification and validation, or between quality control and quality assurance.

Comment author: Stabilizer 03 October 2013 09:15:52PM 25 points [-]

A majority of life's errors are caused by forgetting what one is really trying to do.

-Charlie Munger

Comment author: snafoo 09 October 2013 08:35:44PM 5 points [-]

Hyperbole.

Comment author: Kawoomba 25 September 2013 07:56:08PM 8 points [-]

I believe that the final words man utters on this Earth will be "It worked!", it'll be an experiment that isn't misused, but will be a rolling catastrophe. (...) Curiosity killed the cat, and the cat never saw it coming.

Jon Stewart, talking to Richard Dawkins (S18, E156)

Comment author: snafoo 01 October 2013 12:27:16AM 4 points [-]

Let's get one thing straight: ignorance killed the cat.

Curiosity was framed.

Comment author: arundelo 02 September 2013 02:44:29AM 25 points [-]

You argue that it would be wrong to stab my neighbor and take all their stuff. I reply that you have an ugly face. I commit the "ad hominem" fallacy because I'm attacking you, not your argument. So one thing you could do is yell "OI, AD HOMINEM, NOT COOL."

[...] What you need to do is go one step more and say "the ugliness of my face has no bearing on moral judgments about whether it is okay to stab your neighbor."

But notice you could've just said that without yelling "ad hominem" first! In fact, that's how all fallacies work. If someone has actually committed a fallacy, you can just point out their mistake directly without being a pedant and finding a pat little name for all of their logical reasoning problems.

-- TychoCelchuuu on Reddit

Comment author: snafoo 05 September 2013 02:22:22PM 21 points [-]

Yeah.

It's like when those stupid car buffs say "Hmmm...yeah, transmission fluid" when telling each other what they think is wrong rather than "It sounds like the part that changes the speed and torque with which the wheels turn with respect to the engine isn't properly lubricated and able to have the right hydraulic pressure, so you should add some green oil product."

-rekam

View more: Next