In response to Joint Configurations
Comment author: stochastic 04 July 2011 01:56:05AM *  1 point [-]

Another great explanation. What you describe suggests that the fabric of the universe is not made of particulate stuff, but rather informational and/or computational. Or am I reading to much into this?

Comment author: stochastic 06 November 2010 02:39:14AM *  1 point [-]

I thought that was a really good, logical, simple explanation. Looking forward to reading the next episode.

Thanks!

Comment author: bentarm 04 November 2010 10:56:05PM 2 points [-]

There are two quite different interpretations of this quote: it either says something about scientists, or something about scientific truths, and I'm not sure which is the intention.

The two messages I see are:

  1. Scientists just enjoy seeking truths, you don't need to give them the incentive of practical applications in order for them to do science, so any truths that can be discovered will be, regardless of their usefulness.

  2. There are an awful lot of true things. The ones that we know might not be the most useful, but they are the ones that happen to lie in the (extremely small?) subset of true things that humans are capable of understanding.

To an extent, I guess both of these are true... which one was Oppenheimer aiming at?

Comment author: stochastic 05 November 2010 10:35:07PM 0 points [-]

<quote>There are an awful lot of true things. </quote>

I think that many of the things that are commonly regarded as being "true" are socially constructed fictions, biases and fallacies. Moreover science can never attain absolute truth it can only strive for it.

Comment author: wedrifid 05 November 2010 08:39:55PM 0 points [-]

I like it.

Comment author: stochastic 05 November 2010 10:26:49PM 0 points [-]

+1