I just saw this link on a pop-news site. It's a PDF file showing how good BBC's reporting of science news is in general, but more specifically it reports about the fact that the journalists give far too much credit to arguments from people who have no scientific backing for their argument. http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/our_work/science_impartiality/science_impartiality.pdf
I have been on the quest for winning at life for a long time. But nothing could prepare me for a run-in with a lesswrongian. My life has been turned upside-down, it turns out that every aspect of my life can be considerably improved or upgraded, but there is so...
I've seen some discussion on "working memory" and "spaced repetition" I just read this pop-science article in which a new hypothesis is presented that seems to provide better predictions and test conditions for measuring working memory. Maybe this can also be used for the SRS contest. http://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-07-brain-track.html
I found this pop-science news article where scientist are seriously trying to use Bayesian reasoning to change beliefs of the field. http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-07-astrophysicists-logic-downplay-probability-extraterrestrial.html
I just saw this link on a pop-news site. It's a PDF file showing how good BBC's reporting of science news is in general, but more specifically it reports about the fact that the journalists give far too much credit to arguments from people who have no scientific backing for...