Comment author: timujin 14 October 2015 10:16:01AM *  3 points [-]

I've lost my curiosity. I have noticed that over the course of the last year, I have become significantly less curious. I no longer feel the need to know anything unless I need it, I don't understand how it is possible to desire knowledge for the sake of knowledge (even though the past me definitely did), I generally find myself unable to empathize with knowledge-seekers and the virtue of curiosity. That worries me a lot, because if you asked me two years earlier, I would have named curiosity as my main characteristic and the desire for knowledge my main driving force. Thinking over the last year, I can't remember any life-changing experiences that would have warranted the change. May it have been the foods I ate, or some neurological damage? I would have attributed it to brain aging, if I weren't twenty. What happened? How to reverse it? I find it crippling.

Comment author: timujin 14 April 2015 07:52:37PM 9 points [-]

“What's up, Sarge? Do you want to live for ever?”

“Dunno. Ask me again in five hundred years.”

  • "Guards! Guards!", Terry Pratchett
Comment author: polymathwannabe 05 January 2015 03:02:41PM 0 points [-]

I strongly recommend this one.

Comment author: timujin 05 January 2015 04:25:50PM 0 points [-]

I'll look into this. Thank you.

Comment author: timujin 05 January 2015 01:12:15PM *  2 points [-]

What is the best way to relatively quickly gain some elementary proficiency in world history? I notice that I have little to no awareness as to how the world came to be as it is (there were cavemen... they discovered fire... thus the technological progress started... gets us to steam engines, then elecricity, and computers...). Is there a good textbook that outlines the issue?

Comment author: pgbh 31 December 2014 02:03:21AM *  0 points [-]

After reading Contrafactus, a friend said to me: "My uncle was almost President of the U.S.!"

"Really?" I said.

"Sure," he replied, "he was skipper of the PT 108." (John F. Kennedy was skipper of the PT 109).

-- Douglas Hofstadter, Godel, Escher, Bach

Comment author: timujin 31 December 2014 08:57:27AM 1 point [-]

It is a good quote in general, but not quite a rationality quote.

Comment author: Elo 25 December 2014 01:11:48AM 0 points [-]

Consider that maybe you might be wrong about the imposter syndrome. As a person without it - its hard to know how you think/feel and how you concluded that you couldn't have it. But maybe its worth asking - How would someone convince you to change your mind on this topic?

Comment author: timujin 25 December 2014 05:40:06PM *  0 points [-]

By entering some important situation where my and his comparative advantage in some sort of competence comes into play, and losing.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 21 December 2014 04:04:01PM 3 points [-]

We don't know that. It was likely some variant of the name commonly translated as "Joshua" in English. It could have been Yeshua or Yehoshua or a variety of slightly Aramacized variants of that.

Comment author: timujin 21 December 2014 05:01:24PM 2 points [-]

But English language's "Jesus" is still far off.

Comment author: hyporational 21 December 2014 04:45:51AM 4 points [-]

The mob is pretty well educated these days, and the standard of living is so high that there's much less incentive to step out of line. I don't think we can compare modern nations to historical nations to make any claim about whether religion keeps people in line.

The claim that people can't pronounce Jesus' name might apply to former Soviet Union countries, but I doubt it applies anywhere else in Europe.

Comment author: timujin 21 December 2014 02:23:37PM 1 point [-]

The claim that people can't pronounce Jesus' name might apply to former Soviet Union countries, but I doubt it applies anywhere else in Europe.

Do you know that Jesus's actual name is Yeshua?

Comment author: ThisSpaceAvailable 19 December 2014 07:19:23AM 0 points [-]

So, you are saying that it is impossible to say what letters are in the word?

Comment author: timujin 19 December 2014 04:07:34PM -2 points [-]

No.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 12 December 2014 10:15:04PM *  1 point [-]

That's a really interesting question, and I don't have an answer to it. Do you have any ideas about how your life might be different in positive ways if you didn't think you were less competent than everyone about everything? Is there anything you'd like to do just because it's important to you?

Comment author: timujin 13 December 2014 04:31:48PM 0 points [-]

Do you have any ideas about how your life might be different in positive ways if you didn't think you were less competent than everyone about everything?

Not anything specific.

Is there anything you'd like to do just because it's important to you?

I have goals and values beyond being content or happy, but they are more than a couple of inferential steps away from my day-to-day routine, and I don't have that inner fire thingy that would bridge the gap. So, more often than not, they are not the main component of my actual motivation. Also, I am afraid of possibility of having my values changed.

View more: Prev | Next