Comment author: Brillyant 27 April 2016 04:53:37PM -3 points [-]

Then where is he getting all the karma? Is it possible there is a rogue mod mole feeding under-the-table karma to Eugine's sock puppets using some clever hack?

Comment author: tut 27 April 2016 07:11:26PM -3 points [-]

He makes a bunch of comments that are good enough to get positive karma, though rarely stellar. Mostly semipolitical quotes in the quotes thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 April 2016 03:40:51AM 0 points [-]

Even then, the system is opt-out. Anyone can become a renunciate who are beyond caste.

Can you give me a source for this? I've never heard of anyone renouncing their caste, and I have heard about many instances of lower-caste people lying about their caste, and I can't reconcile the two.

In response to comment by [deleted] on Open Thread April 11 - April 17, 2016
Comment author: tut 15 April 2016 08:46:22AM 1 point [-]

Beyond caste might be misleading. You can always become casteless, but that is worse than being the lowest caste.

Comment author: Huluk 26 March 2016 12:55:37AM *  26 points [-]

[Survey Taken Thread]

By ancient tradition, if you take the survey you may comment saying you have done so here, and people will upvote you and you will get karma.

Let's make these comments a reply to this post. That way we continue the tradition, but keep the discussion a bit cleaner.

Comment author: tut 27 March 2016 04:36:48PM 36 points [-]

Me too.

Comment author: Clarity 07 February 2016 08:13:23AM *  0 points [-]

Instead, I will elaborate on my interpretation of it and the meaning that I attribute to it:

Seligman briefly mentions that 'PERMA' can be the foundation for a new value-model in politics in a video by the channel: 'happy and well'. This suggests that comparisons of wellbeing above '1', on say a QALY scale are useful. By convention, people are '1' when well, and less than 1 depending on the degree of disease (mental or physical) as it affects their quality of life. The reddit point highlights for me that we may find it effective to improve the happiness of a banker who's stressing himself out making money and blowing it on hookers than someone in ill health in the developing world.

Seligman also describes research that shows people who have experienced all 3 of the 'worst' traumatic experiences tend to experience 'post traumatic growth', more so than those with 2 or one of these experiences: rape, torture and capture. With a bit of Googling I can't find the literature. This makes me less confident in his position but none-the-less hopeful that I've stumbled upon an important line of research for EA's to pursue. Discussing positive things is probably good for the EA diaspora anyway, since doom and gloom talk is rather unpleasant IMO.

Comment author: tut 07 February 2016 08:57:52AM 1 point [-]

If there was anything useful the banker could get for $5 then he would buy it himself. The argument for giving to the poorest people is not that they are the most deserving, or even that they are suffering the most, but rather that they are the cheapest to help.

Comment author: Clarity 06 February 2016 12:46:15AM -1 points [-]

A clever point on the EA reddit. Guessing the Open Philanthropy Project will sniff this out if its the case.

Comment author: tut 06 February 2016 11:52:14AM 0 points [-]

Would you mind summarizing the point. Because I don't get it.

Comment author: Lumifer 27 January 2016 03:48:55PM 1 point [-]

similar to the history of Las Vegas. What parts of it can be replicated?

By traditional mythology, the reason Las Vegas exists is because the mob (mafia) wanted to have a playground far far away from the Feds :-)

Comment author: tut 27 January 2016 05:48:37PM 0 points [-]

Or because it's the place closest to San Francisco where gambling was legal.

Comment author: WhyAsk 24 January 2016 05:36:04PM 0 points [-]

Why does my Karma score keep increasing when I don't do anything? It's a disincentive to post. . .?

Comment author: tut 24 January 2016 07:43:38PM 1 point [-]

Presumably people read your old comments and upvote them.

Comment author: ChristianKl 09 January 2016 11:26:49AM 0 points [-]

Aren't the big banks publically traded and expected to grow by stock market analysts? How does that work when they get negative interest rates?

Comment author: tut 10 January 2016 05:27:57PM 0 points [-]

They get positive expected real interest from loans they give, but pay negative real interest on deposits they receive.

Comment author: Lumifer 08 January 2016 03:59:44PM 1 point [-]

under the Khmer Rouge, you really didn't want to be ethnic Chinese

Did Khmer Rouge really care about ethnicity, or that was just a convenient marker for a particular social class?

Comment author: tut 09 January 2016 06:58:17PM 0 points [-]

Taboo 'care'. They did kill people just for looking Chinese.

Comment author: Viliam 07 January 2016 12:28:42PM *  3 points [-]

I don't know. Seems to me possible that people like Paul Graham (or Eliezer Yudkowsky) may overestimate the impact of technical change on wealth distribution because of the selection bias -- they associate with people who mostly make wealth using the "fair" methods.

If instead they would be spending most of their time among African warlords, or Russian oligarchs, or whatever is their more civilized equivalent in USA, maybe they would have very different models of how wealth works.

The technological progress explains why the pie is growing, not how the larger pie is divided.

There are probably more people who got rich selling homeopathics, than who got rich founding startups. Yet in our social sphere it is a custom to pretend that the former option does not exist, and focus on the latter.

Comment author: tut 08 January 2016 06:00:08PM 1 point [-]

... or whatever is their more civilized equivalent in USA

I think the generalized concept is 'politicians'. And yeah, that sounds likely. But I would say that it is a problem that the ones who make the rules and the ones who explain to everyone else what's what all live in an environment where earning something honestly is weird is a problem. That there are some who are not in such a bubble is not the problem.

View more: Prev | Next