Comment author: lukeprog 16 February 2013 08:40:20PM 1 point [-]

Wisdom is more easily tweeted than internalized.

Saeid Fard

Comment author: vallinder 16 February 2013 08:55:50PM 1 point [-]

Indeed, even this quote is way below 140 characters :-)

By the way, you're off by a year: the February 2013 thread is here.

Comment author: vallinder 02 February 2013 03:24:50PM 7 points [-]

This was a fun read. Reminds me of Terry Bisson's "They're made out of meat."

Comment author: Utilitarian 27 January 2013 12:01:28PM 4 points [-]

Preventing suffering is what I care about, and I'm going to try to convince other people to care about it. One way to do that is to invent plausible thought experiments / intuition pumps for why it matters so much. If I do, that might help with evangelism, but it's not the (original) reason why I care about it. I care about it because of experience with suffering in my own life, feeling strong empathy when seeing it in others, and feeling that preventing suffering is overridingly important due to various other factors in my development.

Comment author: vallinder 27 January 2013 12:05:05PM 2 points [-]

Thanks, Brian. I know this is your position, I'm wondering if it's benthamite's as well.

Comment author: Pablo_Stafforini 27 January 2013 12:49:17AM *  6 points [-]

When I become directly acquainted with an episode of intense suffering, I come to see that this is a state of affairs that ought not to exist. My empathy may be limited, but I don't need to empathize with others to recognize that, when they suffer, their suffering ought to be relieved too.

I don't pretend to speak on behalf of all other hedonistic utilitarians, however. Brian himself would probably disagree with my answer. He would instead reply that he "just cares" about other people's suffering, and that's that.

Comment author: vallinder 27 January 2013 11:54:15AM 1 point [-]

Knowing that you've abandoned moral realism, how would you respond to someone making an analogous argument about preferences or duties? For instance, "When a preference of mine is frustrated, I come to see this as a state of affairs that ought not to exist," or "When someone violates a duty, I come to see this as a state of affairs that ought not to exist." Granted, the acquaintance may not be as direct as in the case of intense suffering. But is that enough to single out pleasure and suffering?

Comment author: vallinder 18 January 2013 10:31:29AM 2 points [-]

I find the title a bit confusing. To me it seems a better one would be "Outline of Possible Sources of Knowledge of Values." Or am I misunderstanding you?

Comment author: vallinder 04 December 2012 12:08:44PM 6 points [-]

I am curious about the qualifier "pre-1980." Do you think later work in these disciplines is noticeably better?

Comment author: vallinder 08 November 2012 05:47:55PM 0 points [-]

"What Would AIXI Do With Infinite Computing Power and a Halting Oracle?"

Is this problem well-posed? Doesn't the answer depend completely on the reward function?

Comment author: vallinder 06 November 2012 09:08:56AM 10 points [-]

The folly of mistaking a paradox for a discovery, a metaphor for a proof, a torrent of verbiage for a spring of capital truths, and oneself for an oracle, is inborn in us.

Paul Valéry

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 20 July 2012 04:37:50AM 0 points [-]

That would require some way to quantify progress. Thoughts on how to do that?

Comment author: vallinder 20 July 2012 07:04:46AM 2 points [-]

You could estimate the amount of time spent procrastinating. If you're at a computer, RescueTime or similar software might help you do that. You could also try to count how often you feel like procrastinating, and how often you actually do procrastinate. Of course, this might be tricky to do accurately.

Comment author: vallinder 19 July 2012 06:49:25AM 2 points [-]

Have you tried Beeminder for logging progress?

View more: Prev | Next